How Abortion Might Motivate or Persuade Voters in the Midterms
A Commentary By Kyle Kondik, Larry Schack, and Mick McWilliams
Project Home Fire data reveal partisan attitudes on abortion.
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE
— The end of Roe vs. Wade could potentially give Democrats a better chance to motivate their own voters and/or persuade Republican-leaning swing voters.
— Public opinion on abortion is nuanced, although more are likelier to take the pro-abortion rights side on a couple of key questions.
— It’s unclear whether abortion opinions would outweigh the public’s opinions about other issues where Democrats are vulnerable.
Abortion and the midterms
The potential demise of Roe vs. Wade could both help Democrats generate higher turnout and appeal better to persuadable, Republican-leaning swing voters in the 2022 election who generally have a concern about women losing access to safe and legal abortion services, according to a new analysis from the University of Virginia Center for Politics/Project Home Fire data analytics project. These findings are based on Project Home Fire’s baseline survey and analysis of the attitudes of roughly 1,000 Joe Biden and 1,000 Donald Trump voters collected prior to Monday’s Politico report about a potential Supreme Court decision that could overrule Roe. (For more information about this project, see some of our past reports linked at the end of this article.)
Project Home Fire asked respondents a couple of questions about abortion rights. The first asked how concerned they were about preventing women from losing access to safe and legal abortion services, and the second was whether they believed abortion should be legal. Responses were given on a 100-point scale, with 0 essentially indicating a maximal anti-abortion rights position (no concern about access to safe and legal abortion services and a belief that abortion should always be illegal) and 100 essentially indicating a maximal pro-abortion rights position (very strong concern about women losing access and that abortion should be legal in all instances).
Tables 1 and 2 show the overall results for these 2 questions. Notice that there are majorities in each instance for at least somewhat supporting the pro-abortion rights question (choosing 51 or above on the scale).
Table 1: Level of concern about women losing access to safe and legal abortion services
Table 2: Support for abortion rights
The tables also break down these questions by party identification. What we find is not particularly surprising: Republicans are likelier to select answers in the range 50 and under (less supportive of abortion rights) while Democrats are likelier to select answers in the range over 50 (more supportive of abortion rights). Those who identify as independents are also likelier to be on the pro-abortion rights side of the range on both questions.
Note, too, that there are a fair number of Republicans, Democrats, and independents who are somewhat in the middle on these questions (those who picked numbers ranging from 26 to 75 for both questions). For instance, note the question about whether a respondent was concerned about women’s access to safe and legal abortion services. Collectively, about 37% of all respondents landed in this category, including roughly equal numbers of Republicans (36%), Democrats (35%), and independents (39%).
These are likely the kinds of people who may be persuadable either way on the topic of abortion. In a forthcoming analysis of voters based on their 2022 voting intentions, we found that “Preventing women from losing access to safe and legal abortion services” emerges as one of the stronger issues for motivating Democratic base and swing voters to get to the polls in 2022 and potentially persuading Republican-leaning voters near the Democratic vs. Republican dividing line to shift their voting intentions to the other side from their present leanings. However, the data also suggest that abortion is more powerful in motivating Democrats than persuading Republican swing voters. Still, these voters present as open to maintaining a woman’s right to choose on abortion and the idea that America should be doing more to ensure this, not less. There are also other salient issues/messages for these voters besides abortion, which we’ll explore more in-depth in that forthcoming piece.
Looking forward, it's very much unclear what will happen with abortion in the 2022 election. For starters, we do not even know if the U.S. Supreme Court’s eventual opinion in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization will be the same as the one that Politico reported on earlier this week. We also know that, abortion aside, this looks like a Republican-leaning political environment, both based on history and the president’s weak approval ratings.
But our analysis does suggest that 1. The public, broadly speaking, is more supportive of abortion rights and more concerned about women’s access to abortion services than not and 2. There are voters who may be animated by Roe vs. Wade being overturned, which could give Democrats a desperately-needed shot in the arm this November given their many other political problems this year. Whether abortion would trump the concerns that persuadable voters have on other issues — such as inflation and broader economic concerns, where the Democrats appear very vulnerable — remains to be seen, but we may find out if and when the Supreme Court releases their potentially explosive actual opinion on abortion.
Kyle Kondik is managing editor of Sabato’s Crystal Ball. Drs. Robert “Mick” McWilliams and Larry Schack are co-founders of Project Home Fire, an initiative dedicated to finding common ground in American politics that is working with the UVA Center for Politics to explore and address the political, social, and psychological divides in the American electorate.
For more information on the University of Virginia Center for Politics/Project Home Fire polling and data analytics project and how it is being conducted, see the previous stories in the Crystal Ball exploring the deep and persistent divides between Biden and Trump voters; what drives support for secession; the outsized role immigration plays in fueling our national divide; who is most open to compromise in American politics; the polarization of attitudes on voting rules; and Biden/Trump voter views on the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.
See Other Political Commentary by Kyle Kondik.
See Other Political Commentary.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.