The Real Experts
A Commentary by John Stossel
The vaccine rollout crawls forward. Most of us will spend weeks, or months, waiting.
Great Britain did better. As of today, one-third of the English are already vaccinated, twice as many as in America.
A big reason is that our government decided to rigidly follow its regimen for the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines: two doses, about a month apart.
But why insist on two doses?
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are about 90% effective after one dose, according to clinical trial data.
British officials sensibly decided to give people one dose, before insisting that everyone get a second dose. It worked. Once people got a first dose, the coronavirus cases began to level off. Although COVID-19 was worse than Great Britain than in America, British cases have now dropped below America's.
George Mason University economist Alex Tabarrok helped convince British health officials to try the "first-dose-first" approach. But he couldn't convince American officials.
"We have given out more than 20 million second doses," Tabarrok complains in my new video. "Those could have been first doses!"
Had they been, 50% more Americans would have received a vaccine by now.
"Why would we believe you, rather than these specialist doctors?" I ask.
"Physicians (are) not necessarily thinking about the person who is not their patient," he replies, "An economist, you've gotta be thinking about everybody."
It's not too late for America to change policy.
But our government's planners won't change without "a proper study."
In the time the study will take, says Dr. Anthony Fauci, "we will already be in the arena of having enough vaccines to go around anyway."
Tabarrok, wisely, says in a national emergency, we should skip that study and give one dose a real-world test. "You have to act quickly. Bureaucrats are just not used to doing that."
On TV, Fauci once said: "You can do both! You can get as many people in their first dose at the same time as adhering within reason to the timetable of the second dose."
But we can't do both. There are tradeoffs in life.
"We have to take into account scarcity," says Tabarrok. "This is what economists are good at: thinking about scarcity and thinking about tradeoffs."
America's bureaucratic medical approval process is all about following certain rules.
"They've been too slow. They've made mistakes," complains Tabarrok. "The FDA did not allow private companies to start testing."
That meant that for weeks, labs sat idle.
The bureaucracy also slowed the distribution of vaccines.
"We had the doses stockpiled... ready to go. The state governments weren't ready. They didn't have websites ready," Tabarrok points out. "Even though they'd been told months and months, this is coming, vaccines are coming... get ready. And they said, Oh, we don't have enough money. Give me a break. They have tons of money."
"They acted more quickly than they usually do," I point out.
"Not fast enough," replies Tabarrok.
Fortunately, people outside government stepped up.
Olivia Adams, a software engineer in Massachusetts, got frustrated with her state's vaccine website and built a site that makes it easier to find COVID-19 vaccine appointments. So did Huge Ma, an engineer in New York.
"It's been amazing to see how much expertise there is in the world, outside the usual expert channels," says Tabarrok. "The government has just been behind the virus every single step of the way."
Fortunately, big greedy corporations were on the ball.
"Thank God for the manufacturers of vaccines for Moderna and Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson that have been the one saving grace in this crisis. Capitalism has brought us the vaccines at a faster pace than ever before. And most of that was due to (SET ITAL)lifting(END ITAL) of government regulations."
He's right. At the beginning of the pandemic, the FDA lifted regulations, which allowed companies to create vaccines more quickly. Without that freedom, vaccine approval would have taken years.
When the pandemic ends, politicians will take credit, but the solution, as usual, began when politicians got out of the way.
John Stossel is author of "Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media." For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by John Stossel.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.