If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.


Change the Constitution?

A Commentary by John Stossel

This Fourth of July, watching people fight over what the Constitution means, I ask people, if you could change the Constitution, what would you change?

"The forefathers knew what they were doing," said one woman.

But the Constitution originally accepted slavery. It's good that we can amend it.

So what should we change?

"Add a balanced budget amendment," suggests Glenn Beck.

David Boaz of the Cato Institute recommends 18-year terms for the Supreme Court. "Maybe confirmation fights would be less bitter and partisan."

Others suggest term limits for Congress. Stossel TV's Mike Ricci takes the idea further. "If your father, mother, siblings, uncle, cousins were elected to federal office, you can't be." That would curb Kennedy/Bush-like dynasties.

Several people said they want to eliminate the Commerce Clause. It gives government virtually unlimited power over the economy, complains tech journalist Naomi Brockwell, "forcing people to participate in federal pension programs ... enabling the War on Drugs."

Some want an amendment to stop the growth of Washington regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, and Federal Communications Commission. Economist Don Boudreaux calls them "a grave threat to Americans' liberties and prosperity."

The Supreme Court took a small step in restraining their power last week when it ruled that EPA bureaucrats can't set emission rules all by themselves. Congress has to vote on that.

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif, proposes overturning Citizens United. He says that would stop those who "spend millions of dollars corrupting elections (and) would return our democracy to the town halls and citizen involvement that our founders envisioned."

I doubt that. Limits on political speech increase insiders' power.

Christina Martin of the Pacific Legal Institute wishes the Constitution did more to protect the rights of the individual. "How about a right to earn a living? How about a right to not have the government steal from you?"

But some young people told us they want to eliminaterights already in the Constitution, like free speech.

"Being able to speak your mind is important," said one, "as long as it's not in a way that is going to be long-term harmful to people."

Ouch. Who decides what is harmful? Will he get to censor my videos?

The Bill of Rights also includes the right to bear arms. Babylon Bee's Kyle Mann would add some lines to clarify that "you can't pass laws restricting ownership of firearms."

Others want to get rid of the Second Amendment. "We have police officers. We have a military," said one woman in Times Square. "So do we really need them? No."

I'm glad another person corrected her. "The only reason we stand on freedom is because we got the right to bear arms!" he says. "(Because of the Second Amendment) We're all a micro government in our own way."

We are all "micro governments?" I like that.

The Goldwater Institute's Tim and Christina Sandefur would add "protections against the abuse of eminent domain" and "ban subsidies to special interests."

I like changes that might limit government power, and I wonder: How did government grow so powerful when the Constitution was created to limit government's power?

Podcaster Michael Malice says it's because the Constitution is often ignored.

"The First Amendment says the right of people to peaceably assemble shall not be infringed, (but) not even libertarians bothered to invoke that to fight the lockdowns and quarantining." Malice is an anarchist who says he'd put the Constitution "in the trash, where it belongs."

I disagree. So did most people we asked.

"Our founders wrote documents ... designed to give you life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," says podcaster Dave Rubin. "Perhaps they should've done it in bold so more people would've paid attention."

More people should. My short videos are my attempt to let young people know that our Constitution limits government power and that rights belong to individuals. Most simply don't know that.

John Stossel is creator of Stossel TV and author of "Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media." For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.

See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by John Stossel.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.