Will the Media's Newfound Stridency Continue Under Biden? No.
A Commentary By Ted Rall
"In his first rally since losing the election last month, President Trump continued to spout conspiracy theories about voter fraud, falsely claiming that he had defeated President-elect Joe Biden." That was the lede of a news story in the Dec. 5 Washington Post.
The Associated Press took a similar tack. "President Donald Trump flooded his first post-election political rally with debunked conspiracy theories and audacious falsehoods Saturday as he claimed victory in an election he decisively lost," began the wire service's coverage.
You'll find similarly opinionated news coverage about President Donald Trump in almost every issue of many major newspapers over the last several years. It's easy to see why many of the president's supporters don't trust the mainstream media to be fair to conservatives.
You may long for a return to the days when too many reporters played the role of government stenographers, striving for a neutral tone while dutifully regurgitating the most ridiculous nonsense spewing out of the maws of official propagandists. Not me. Busy news consumers rely on journalists to frame and explain current events, not just reorganize press releases. Skepticism of presidents and labeling their obvious lies are long overdue.
From former President Barack Obama's "If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," to former Vice President Dick Cheney's "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction," the public would have benefited from news accounts that emphasized that these claims not only were not true but could not be true. As reporters knew, Obamacare was structured in a way that made it impossible for many preexisting health insurance plans to remain financially viable within the system. And with regard to Hussein, there is always doubt in the military intelligence business; the credulous tone of this reporting enabled the mass misleading of the American people. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died as a result.
So when it comes to Trump, better late than never. But will journalists' newfound courage survive into the Biden years? Early indications are discouraging.
Throughout the general election campaign, journalists were unduly solicitous as the Democratic nominee generally shunned one-on-one interviews with major news organizations. In July, Biden only granted 10 TV interviews, nine of which were with local outlets. Despite being the oldest major-party candidate ever to run for president, and despite repeated stumbles and verbal slips on the campaign trail, he faced few questions about his physical health or mental acuity. Liberal-leaning journalists largely dismissed his son Hunter Biden's fiscal adventures in Ukraine as the product of the fevered imagination of far-right conspiracy theorists; Twitter and Facebook even censored a New York Post story about it. Now that a federal investigation into his taxes has been announced, Hunter is clearly a legitimate line of inquiry. Yet the issue is still not getting much coverage.
Accounts of Biden's Cabinet choices appear to harken a return to the stenographer days. Many praise the president-elect's effort to increase "diversity" in a Cabinet Democrats say will "look like America" while ignoring one type of diversity: ideological. Though Biden's top advisers will include many women and some people of color, there is no indication that a single progressive will be in the room while he decides the fate of the nation.
Stories about former Mayor Pete Buttigieg's nomination as secretary of transportation bury the elephant in the room. "President-elect Joe Biden will nominate former Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg to be Transportation secretary," Politico began its story. "Buttigieg's ascension to the top spot at DOT marks the culmination of a meteoric rise in politics over the last two years from the mayor of South Bend, Ind., to the first openly gay Cabinet secretary, if he is confirmed." A reference to Buttigieg's "thin transportation policy resume" appears in paragraph five.
Had the story been like those about Trump's Cabinet picks, it likely would have begun something like: "Overlooking experienced transit experts, President-elect Joe Biden instead turned to a young loyalist who helped hand him the nomination, former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, to head the transportation department. South Bend, a city of 100,000, has a fleet of 60 buses." Tone matters.
All presidents lie. Biden lies, too, as he did during a primary debate, when he denied having supported the Hyde Amendment. One hopes that the media will treat him harshly when he does it again, both to be consistent with the more strident scrutiny they have directed at Trump the last four years and to better serve their readers and viewers. But it doesn't look likely.
Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall), political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of the biography "Bernie." You can support Ted's hard-hitting political cartoons and columns by sponsoring his work on Patreon. To find out more about Ted Rall and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2020 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by Ted Rall.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.