My Critique of Hillary Clinton's Campaign
A Commentary By Ted Rall
Last week, I handicapped the Bernie Sanders campaign. He since pulled off an upset in the Iowa Caucus, where he overcame a 40-point lead by Hillary Clinton to a virtual tie so even that coin tosses and bureaucratic incompetence may have made a difference.
It's a two-person race, with Clinton still in the lead. But Sanders has momentum and enthusiasm. Can the Independent Senator from Vermont catch up? Democratic primaries are a referendum on the status quo, so Sanders' chances depend at least as much on Secretary Clinton's weaknesses as on his strengths.
Here's what Clinton has going for -- and against -- her.
As in her run against Obama, Clinton's strategists are selling competence and experience. "A progressive who gets things done," she is calling herself.
Scratch a little, however, and there's precious little evidence of substantial things she actually got done. Googling phrases like "Hillary Clinton's biggest accomplishments" yields lists that include "most-traveled Secretary of State" and "gave a speech in Geneva standing up for gay rights."
Clinton's "achievements" are activities, not accomplishments.
Fortunately for her, most voters don't question the Been Everywhere, Done Everything meme. She does have quite a resume: First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State. Though, for the life of me, I don't understand why Sanders' Mayor, Congressman and Senator resume (longer in total, more reelections) doesn't count.
When you talk to people who are seriously considering casting their votes for Clinton, many say they like that she's a woman president straight out of central casting -- tough and strong, with the slightly dystopian Corporate Leader wardrobe to boot. Here's to you, Jodie Foster in "Elysium."
Clinton knows everyone in DC. She knows world leaders. She won't need months to settle into the White House.
This is an antiestablishment year. Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders are benefitting from an electorate whose simmering disappointment over the replacement of Hope and Change in 2008 with the Too Big To Fail bank bailouts of 2009 is finally being articulated into rage at the ballotbox. As Obama's cabinet member, that's on her.
Clinton can't run away from her Beltway insiderdom. To her credit, she isn't trying. To the contrary, she's hugging Obama and using head-over-heart rhetoric as hard as she can. She's just the wrong candidate for this year. Which means that, if she wins the nomination, she'll go into the general election campaign as bruised by Bernie Sanders as Jimmy Carter was in 1980 after facing off against Ted Kennedy. Many Sanders Democrats will sit on their hands in November if she's the nominee.
Clinton isn't stupid. She knows her formidable organizational advantages -- cash, a SuperPAC, party backing, endorsements by establishment organizations including trade unions and corporate media, which have enforced a blackout of Bernie coverage -- no longer guarantee her once "inevitable" campaign. So she's coopting Bernie's positions on healthcare and other issues of interest to progressives.
Problem is, voters usually pick pure steak over mystery meat.
Obama's famous 2008 slight that Clinton was "likeable enough" turns out not to be so true. On the campaign trail and on TV, Clinton is charmless. She can't up her personality game.
With the liberal base of Clinton's party agitated at 1960s levels, she can't explain away her conservative record. She's never met a free trade deal or a war she didn't like.
She says she's been fighting for progressive causes for years, but when? Where? Even on the micro-bore social "wedge" issues that her husband relied upon as president, she's in trouble. Gays won't forget her support of the Defense of Marriage Act. Straights think she's a reed in the political wind.
But Clinton's biggest flaw as a candidate isn't policy. It's her failure to internalize two truisms of politics.
Number one: Candidates win by projecting an optimistic vision of the future. When she criticizes Sanders for advocating changes that would be hard to get through Congress and expensive to pay for -- free college tuition, Medicare for everybody -- she projects a radical pessimism that makes many ask, why not? Why can't the country that invades everyone, that sent a man to the moon, provide the same social benefits as most other nations?
And number two: Elections aren't about the candidate. They're about the people. This goes back to when tribes elected chiefs. Vote for me, and buffalo will rain from the sky! We'll be fat! Water everywhere! That's a winning campaign -- not, hey, as the first elder from the Whatever Clan to become chief, I'd make tribal history and wouldn't that be cool.
Obama didn't win in 2008 by running as Future First Black President. He projected a sunny, winning disposition and a sense of the future we could buy into. Hope! Change! Yes We Can! Hillary's campaign is all about her, not us.
That's political suicide.
(Ted Rall is the author of "Bernie," a biography written with the cooperation of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders. "Bernie" is now on sale online and at all good bookstores.)
COPYRIGHT 2016 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by Ted Rall.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.