Fonda & Redford: Hollywood's New Welfare Mooches
A Commentary By Michelle Malkin
COLORADO SPRINGS -- My adopted hometown will soon be the base of operations for a new Netflix movie starring aging elitist hippies Robert Redford (estimated net worth: $170 million) and Jane Fonda (estimated net worth: $120 million).
A state economic development commission unanimously voted last week to fork over $1.5 million in taxpayer-funded "incentives" for the liberal duo's romantic flick, arguing that it will generate "great publicity."
But given the fierce opposition so many men and women in uniform in this proud military community have to Hanoi Jane Fonda, I'll bet many of my friends and neighbors wish they could pay to keep the traitorous commie propagandist as far away from the Rockies as possible.
The same goes for Redford, whose last big directing foray was the domestic terrorism-glamorizing hagiography of the Weather Underground movement, "The Company You Keep."
The Colorado panel's got a lousy track record when it comes to picking winners. It last dumped $5 million into cop-bashing Quentin Tarantino's box-office disappointment, "The Hateful Eight."
On a broader policy level, the entertainment corporate welfare racket should offend all taxpayers.
Government officials make phony-baloney claims that their public-private "investments" will pay for themselves. But study after study, on both the progressive left and the free-market right, shows that the economy-stimulating effect of public subsidies for private corporate preferences (movies, sports stadiums, malls, hotels, you name it) is negligible.
Loan guarantees. Refundable tax credits and rebates. Tax increment financing. Tax-exempt bonds. All of these enticements dangled by thirsty bureaucrats before wealthy developers, sports-team owners and Hollywood moguls who don't need them amount to blatant redistributions of wealth.
The independent California Legislative Analyst's Office found that for every dollar California spent on the $100 million annual film subsidy it created in 2009, the state treasury received 65 cents.
In South Carolina, film incentives returned just 19 cents in taxes for each dollar paid out in rebates. That's "a net loss in revenues equal to 81 percent of expenditures on rebates," as the Tax Foundation pointed out. Maryland barely managed to recoup 6 cents on every spent on its film tax incentive program.
A Connecticut children's advocacy group reported that only 11 percent of the $113.2 million of state revenues lost through the film tax credit program subsidized production expenses that were classified as "actual Connecticut expenditures." Eight subsidized productions received nearly $10 million in tax credits despite reporting zero actual Connecticut production spending.
A 2009 report by the Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee found that the state lost nearly $59 million on its $75 million film tax credit and grant program.
Astonishingly, the conservative Mackinac Center in Michigan determined that the state's $500 million spent on film subsidies since 2008 resulted in fewer film jobs than when the program started.
And after reviewing Hollywood handout programs in more than 40 states, the left-wing Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that subsidies reward companies for production that would have happened anyway; most of the top jobs "created" by the "incentives" go to out-of-state industry veterans, and the revenue generated by economic activity supposedly tied to the subsidies "falls far short of the subsidies' direct costs to the state."
Perspective: The nearly $1.5 billion in direct Hollywood giveaways doled out every year since 2010 by state governments is equivalent to "the salaries of 23,500 middle school teachers, 26,600 firefighters, and 22,800 police patrol officers."
It's the same story north of the border. Canadian Taxpayers Federation analyst Jordan Bateman reported that British Columbia's treasury "likely lost $220 million or more" in public film production funding "that should have gone to education, health care or tax cuts."
This legalized bribery is a perfect recipe for pay-for-play and political corruption. Hacked Sony emails showed corporate executives embracing five-figure campaign donations to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo because he's a "strong protector of the film incentive." Cuomo massively expanded the program, which now doles out nearly an annual half-billion dollars in tax money to entertainment special interests.
In Iowa, six officials were fired or forced to resign over allegations they squandered film tax credit funding on personal luxury goods, including a Land Rover, and steered the subsidies to unqualified recipients.
Louisiana's top film official went to prison for accepting bribes from a movie producer in exchange for state tax credits.
This whole stinking enterprise is a crime. When Big Hollywood and Big Government conspire to turn Jane Fonda and Robert Redford into welfare mooches at ordinary Americans' expense, it's time to yell "Cut!"-- permanently.
Michelle Malkin is a senior editor at Conservative Review. For more articles and videos from Michelle, visit ConservativeReview.com. Her email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
COPYRIGHT 2016 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by Michelle Malkin.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.