If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.


A Closetful of Hillary Clinton's Immigration Costumes

A Commentary by Michelle Malkin

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

When it comes to immigration policy, Hillary Clinton's had more career costume changes than her new BFF Katy Perry.

This week, Clinton donned her militant, pro-illegal immigration mask and vowed to out-executive amnesty her old pals at the White House. "I will go as far as I can, even beyond President Obama," she bragged, "to make sure law-abiding, decent, hard-working people in this country are not ripped away from their families."

The millions of "law-abiding" people she's talking about legalizing, of course, are law-breaking border crossers, visa overstayers, document fraudsters and deportation fugitives who chose on their own to rip their families apart.

But hey, let's not get bogged down in small details.

As her more "progressive" 2016 challengers breathe down her neck, the perpetually transmogrifying Clinton has done everything but change her name to "Hilaria" and don an "Aztlan Nation" T-shirt to lock up the Latino vote.

During one of her umpteenth campaign reboots this summer, she hired a 26-year-old illegal immigrant "DREAMer" named Lorella Praeli to conduct "outreach to the Latino community." She trumpeted her "comprehensive immigration reform" plan before the ethnic radicals of the National Council of La Raza ("The Race.") And she crusaded last week for opening up Obamacare exchanges (which continue to crumble across the country under the weight of skyrocketing costs) to untold legions of immigrants here illegally.

Election-year conversions are nothing new. But Clinton's immigration path contains more switchbacks than a Colorado mountain road. One season she's a bleeding-heart Mechista. The next, she's channeling her inner Pat Buchanan with sound bites that would make a Trump loyalist cheer. "A country that cannot control its borders is failing at one of its fundamental obligations," she thundered many moons ago. "I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants," she asserted in 2003.

But that was then. This is now. Like Forrest Gump's box of chocolates, you never know what yer gonna get with Transformer Hillary.

After the horrific murder of San Francisco's Kate Steinle by a serial criminal alien who had been deported multiple times, Clinton disavowed sanctuary policies and stated she had "absolutely no support for a city" that looked the other way. Almost immediately, a campaign spokeswoman named Xochitl Hinojosa clarified that her boss believed sanctuary cities can "enhance public safety" and supported more amnesty (that is, more illegal immigration) to cure the bloody consequences of unfettered illegal immigration.

All clear now?

Before Clinton was for driver's licenses for aliens here illegally, she was sorta-kinda against them. Her slippery straddling evoked mockery among her Democratic presidential rivals in 2007, when she was asked during a debate whether she supported then-New York Democratic Gov. Eliot Sptizer's licensing scheme.

"Well, what Governor Spitzer is trying to do is fill the vacuum left by the failure of this administration to bring about comprehensive immigration reform," she babbled. After Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., unequivocally stated that "a license is a privilege and that ought not to be extended" to law-breakers, she protested that "she did not say that it should be done, but I certainly recognize what Governor Spitzer is trying to do."

Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., jibed, "Unless I missed something, Senator Clinton said two different things in the course of about two minutes, just a few minutes ago." Then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., declared that he "was confused on Senator Clinton's answer. I can't tell whether she was for it or against it."

Cynical birds of a feather flip-flop together. In 2006, both Obama and Clinton voted for the Secure Fence Act, which in theory mandated construction of a 700-mile barrier along the southern border. Barely two years later, both Democratic presidential rivals renounced their support after Texas special interests complained about the inconvenience to the "community" and open-borders activists whined about onerous passport requirements.

(The grand irony is that the Secure Fence Act was a bipartisan ruse all along -- a Kabuki gesture from the "immigration reform" illusionists in both parties that was purposely underfunded, slow-walked, and sabotaged by Bush administration bureaucrats and cronies.)

"You know where I stand" on immigration, Clinton is telling voters. But she doesn't stand so much as she slithers from one expedient position to another and back in order to mollify Big Business and identity politics racketeers. Rest assured: The one role she'll never play convincingly is that of truth-telling defender of "law-abiding, decent, hard-working" citizens who believe in putting American sovereignty and American interests first.

Michelle Malkin is author of the new book "Who Built That: Awe-Inspiring Stories of American Tinkerpreneurs." Her email address is malkinblog@gmail.com.


See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by Michelle Malkin.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.