If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.


Let Them In

A Commentary By John Stossel

Millions flee Ukraine.

Where will they go?

Some want to come to America. But doing that legally is hard. A complex system is supposed to determine which people deserve to get in line to get in.

"The line is broken," explains Reason Magazine editor at large Matt Welch in my new video.

For example, America has a nursing shortage, but immigration authorities turn away foreign nurses. A Mexican teenager who wants to help build houses might be admitted, but he'd have to wait 100 years. No wonder people sneak across the border.

This month, President Joe Biden announced the United States would take in 100,000 refugees from Ukraine.

"He could snap his fingers and make it 250,000 if he chose," says Welch, and he should, because "we're a refugee country, and the people who come here tend to be the best."

"But they could be the worst," I point out.

Even the supposed "worst of the worst," Welch replies, made America better.

That's a reference to 1980, when Fidel Castro let 100,000 people out of jail and encouraged them to go to America. Some were his political opponents, but most were, as a Miami TV anchor put it, "bums off the streets of Havana -- murderers, thieves, perverts, prostitutes."

Castro assumed they'd cause problems in America.

But "that was wrong," says Welch. Despite their past problems, "they enriched Miami. They added to the economy and didn't detract from the people who lived there." A study showed that the Cuban exodus raised wages of low-skilled Miamians.

Immigrants improved America even when we took in people who'd tried to kill us, and who we had tried to kill. Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter eagerly took in refugees from Vietnam and Cambodia. Reagan, campaigning for the presidency, said immigrants make us better. "They share the same values, the same dream."

"He was bragging on this as a conservative and American value," says Welch. "It is no longer a conservative value."

Today, conservatives are more likely to argue against letting in refugees, saying, as Ann Coulter put it, "Things can turn overnight when you're bringing in these masses of people from very, very different cultures." Then she joked, "And make it a hate crime to ask them to assimilate."

It wasn't entirely a joke. Some leftists call asking Latinos to assimilate "racist repression."

More reasonably, many Americans fear that crime will rise if we let in more immigrants. But that's unlikely.

"They commit far less crime than native-born Americans," Welch points out. He's right. Native-born Americans were 11.6 times more likely to be jailed than Afghan immigrants.

"It's hard for us to process that fact," says Welch. "It feels like it should be wrong, but it isn't. People who go to the lengths to get to this country tend to be less criminal than the native-born population."

"What if they just feed off welfare?" I ask.

"Then they would be the exception," he responds. Immigrants, overall, collect less welfare than native-born Americans.

Still, people feel threatened when large numbers of foreigners arrive. Polish people protested when Syrian refugees came to Poland.

But now Poles welcome Ukrainians.

Some call that racism.

"Maybe it is racism," Welch responds. "But maybe when someone you speak a common language with, and have a common history with ... lives right next door, it's just a different story. ... Can we spare a moment and say, they've just assimilated an astonishing number of refugees. And they're not in tents in camps, shivering. They're staying with people in their apartments!"

That sure seems like a good thing.

Soon more refugees will come to America. Welch argues that we should let more in.

"America is an assimilation machine," he says. "It's something that we should do more of because we're really good at it!"

I agree.

As long as people are peaceful, let them come.

John Stossel is creator of Stossel TV and author of "Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media." For other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.


See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by John Stossel.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.