If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.


California Crushes Pennsylvania

A Commentary By John Stossel

Pennsylvania's Peter Brothers Trucking delivers goods all across America.

Owner Brian Wanner says Pennsylvania bureaucrats now are driving him out of his home state.

   "We have no say," complains Wanner in my new video. "We can't do anything about it."

   "No say" because Pennsylvania's new rules don't come from Pennsylvania. They come from California.

   "I don't want to be anything like California!" complains Wanner.

   Too bad for him and other Pennsylvania truck owners, because Pennsylvania's Environmental Quality Board decided their state will automatically copy California regulations.

   California's rules will raise the price of a new truck by about one-third. Trucks that once cost $190,000 will now cost about $260,000.

   California regulators said this new air-pollution regulation is needed because the trucks Wanner drives "contribute greatly to ... serious health and welfare problems."

   That's ridiculous, says Wanner. "We have come so far in the last 40 years. In 1980, one truck produced as much (pollution) as 60 trucks today."

   "So to reduce pollution, we want people to buy new trucks," I point out.

   "But if you put these costs on us that we cannot afford, we're going to just run the older trucks!" responds Wanner.

   "The regulators don't think about that?" I ask.

   "They do not!" Wanner replies. "They do not see the consequences of what they're doing."

   Now truckers like Wanner will just buy trucks in neighboring states.

   "We can go to Ohio and get cheaper trucks," he says.

   So there won't be any pollution reduction. The new rule will just hurt Pennsylvanians who sell trucks.

   Who are these regulators? Pennsylvania's Environmental Quality Air Board is mostly made up of people from unrelated departments, like the Fish and Boat Commission, the Game Commission, the Historical & Museum Commission.

I doubt that many know much about air pollution.

   "The whole idea of having a regulatory board like this is, 'Oh, these people are experts,'" says attorney Caleb Kruckenberg of the Pacific Legal Foundation,

"'They know what they're talking about. They're smarter than the lawmakers.' But if you look at the board, that's not true.

 These are just random bureaucrats who work in the government, and they say, 'I don't know. Let's follow California.'"

   Kruckenberg is suing Pennsylvania on behalf of truckers like Wanner, arguing that what Pennsylvania does violates the Constitution.

   "Nobody in Pennsylvania has ever voted for the standards that now control Pennsylvania."

   I push back. "So what? California seems to have a lot of money. I could see a state saying, 'Yeah, let their regulators figure out how we reduce pollution, and we'll save money doing what they do.'"

   "If people want something," Kruckenberg replies, "their legislature is supposed to pass it." 

California's rules will soon get still more expensive because Gov. Gavin Newsom has decreed that soon, all new vehicles must be electric.

   "But electricity comes from fossil fuels!" Kruckenberg points out. In Pennsylvania, some comes from coal, and most comes from natural gas.

   So to power all-electric trucks, Pennsylvania will burn more fossil fuels.

   Still another problem: electric trucks are heavier.

   "That's harder on the roads," says Wanner. Also, "electric trucks have a very low mileage radius, so you can't work all day.

It's nothing that you can take across the United States."   

Pennsylvania's regulators don't seem to care. They just want to do what California does.

   "Why would we allow our state to give away their lawmaking procedures to California?" asks Wanner. "That's not the American way.

If we want to follow California, we can move there! I don't want to be anything like California."

   Every Tuesday at JohnStossel.com, Stossel posts a new video about the battle between government and freedom.

He is the author of "Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media."


See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by John Stossel.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.