Other Paths to Better Pay
A Commentary by Froma Harrop
Did you read about investors in Chipotle Mexican Grill rejecting the outlandish pay package the fast-food chain's two CEOs had cooked up for themselves? Stockholders overwhelmingly booed the mega-million payout, which would have come on top of the $300 million the duo have harvested in recent years.
By the way, the average starting salary at a Chipotle Mexican Grill restaurant is $21,000. And one of the CEOs, founder Steve Ells, makes 778 times the median salary at the chain.
Traditionally, investors looked the other way at ridiculously inflated executive pay when the company was making them money, and Chipotle has been undeniably successful. But now the coverage -- on the financial pages -- cites concern by stockholders that with soaring income inequality in the news, such money grabs are bad for business.
Thus, in an age of weakened private-sector unions, here is a path for workers to wrest a fairer deal. Make clear to investors that gross inequity in pay will go neither unnoticed nor unremarked upon. Note that many customers are fuming about the obscene pay gaps at their own companies.
It's much more effective to make low wages a business matter than a moral one. Shame is a weak tool to use these days. Greed is a fuzzy concept, and foes will accuse its users of harboring a radical philosophy.
Besides, many executives care more about what their peers in Aspen or Greenwich think than what their workers do. In these circles, majestic paydays may be a cause for admiration, not censure.
The typical CEO in America now makes 331 times what the average worker does. In 1980, chief executives were paid 42 times the average employee's salary. Why the difference?
After World War II, a social "norm" had been established discouraging executives from taking princely pay while doling serf wages to the laborers, MIT economist Frank Levy explains. That restraint is gone.
The Dodd-Frank reforms attempted to restore some of it by including an item called "say on pay." It lets shareholders vote on executive compensation plans. The vote is nonbinding -- that is, the board can ignore it -- but it is certainly on record.
The globalization of business has led to a globalization of organized labor, providing workers another means of applying pressure. The fast-food movement, organized by the Service Employees International Union, links American workers with unions from Dublin to Seoul. After all, the hamburger chain they work at in Cleveland also has stores in Venice (McDonald's has three), Istanbul and Manila.
Fast-food workers in 230 cities worldwide recently staged a one-day strike/protest. Theirs is the lowest-paid occupation in this country, typically offering $9 an hour for strenuous work. President Obama has proposed raising the federal minimum wage to $10.10 from the current $7.25.
The fast-food movement has made $15 an hour its goal.
Last year, House Republicans voted in unison to kill a bill that would have set a $10.10 minimum. Senate Republicans have now taken up the cudgel against raising the wage, thus ignoring the sage advice of 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney to go along with the politically popular measure.
Perhaps a national $15-an-hour minimum would be too jarring an increase (though prosperous Seattle seems on the way to it), but something is going to break. A quick approval of a $10.10 wage might take some heat off efforts to obtain even more.
To recap: Union negotiations aren't the only path to better pay. Workers can persuade investors to mind their companies' employee relations. They can create a global PR headache for low-paying businesses. And they can agitate for a higher minimum wage.
Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentary.
See Other Commentaries by Froma Harrop.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.