End the Game on Immigration Reform
A Commentary by Froma Harrop
President Obama's plan to bypass Congress in shielding millions of immigrants from deportation is not the best way to do immigration reform. But if confrontation is what it takes to get House Republicans off their rear ends and deal with the problem, so be it.
They don't even have to work too hard. The Senate has already written a good bill and passed it with votes from both parties. It's a comprehensive approach offering a path to citizenship for most of the estimated 11 million people who came here illegally and beefing up enforcement of the law.
The measure could have passed the House on a bipartisan basis, but Republican House Speaker John Boehner didn't want to offend a conservative base opposed to any kind of amnesty. Thus, he refused to take up the bill.
So what we now have is an immigration system without the beefed-up enforcement. We have the status quo.
Obama tried -- oh, he tried -- to build confidence that these proposed immigration reforms would not fail as past ones had. He deported over 2 million immigrants at considerable political risk to Democrats. This and the lack of action on normalizing the status of those who've grown deep roots in this country may have cost the party key Hispanic support in the recent election. And what did Obama get in return from the House GOP? Zip.
Now it's hardball, and the ball is hurtling onto the Republican court. Fortunately, the Republican freshmen seem a more pragmatic bunch. They could dilute the power of a hard right for whom "stopping Obama" is the only creed -- and it doesn't matter over what.
Obama's executive action most likely will offer several million immigrants a reprieve against deportation. This is not a path to citizenship or permanent-resident green card. It's simply an assurance that for the time being, undocumented immigrants need not fear being removed. New arrivals will still be deported, as will those involved in criminal activity.
If congressional Republicans don't like what Obama's doing, they have a remedy. They can write and pass an immigration law. We assume they haven't forgotten how to do that over the past six years.
Meanwhile, the tantrums have got to stop. Some on the right are already threatening to shut down the government, an antic sure to enrage the public. Boehner is talking tough -- more to calm the fringe, we assume, than a reflection of his own views. He's suggested a triple play: fighting the president "tooth and nail," suing him and shutting down the government.
Surely, Republicans don't want an ugly row over this issue. They don't want the likes of Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, issuing ethnic slurs, and that will happen if they let this fester. Hispanic voters will be out in greater force come the 2016 presidential election. And though polls show Latinos more nuanced on immigration matters than the political stereotypes would have it, no one likes being demonized.
Let's be clear on this: Our immigration laws, though generous, must be respected. We can't ignore the plight of low-skilled American workers suffering depressed wages and high unemployment in part because of competition from immigrants who came here illegally.
America needs a new page on immigration, and that page can't be turned until we deal with the millions in this country illegally. Deporting many, many millions is not going to happen; it's unthinkable. The great majority of unauthorized immigrants are fine people and hard workers. That said, future immigrants must have papers.
Republican leaders should stop wasting time and get the job done -- for the good of the country, as well as themselves. The immigration reform game must end.
Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at email@example.com. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentary.
See Other Commentaries by Froma Harrop.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.