Are Democrats On Track for a Brokered Convention?
A Commentary By Doug Johnson Hatlem
My #10at10 2020 Democratic Primary Model is now live. It includes delegate projections down to the state and congressional district level (State Senate district in Texas) for every state voting from the Iowa Caucus on February 3 through Super Tuesday when 13 states vote a month later. The model uses a variety of factors in an attempt to route around the difficult data-based issues that menace the potential success of such a projection.
There were 177 unique state polls in the three-week periods before relevant primaries in 2016. Eighty of them (45%) missed outside their margin of error (MoE) in projecting Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders’ share of the vote. Fifty-six (32%) underestimated his share of the vote outside their MoE. Of the 24 polls that overestimated his share, 22 were in nine southern states including Texas. The scientific standard for accuracy in polling is 95% – for example “accurate to within +3.2% 19 times out of 20.” Across all 177 polls, Sanders’ share of the vote was underestimated by an average of 3.4%.
Three-quarters or more of likely Democratic voters for the 2020 primaries have not settled into support for a single candidate. The primaries will take place over a 19-week period in which several of the candidates will drop out if they have not already done so in the next six months. All of this should give some idea of why models projecting delegate totals by candidate for the primary season are exceedingly rare and worthy of suspicion.
At this stage, what follows is not a prediction of where things will likely wind up but of how things would go if this model is reasonably accurate and if the Iowa caucuses were imminent. Nevertheless, the model does include defensible innovations to account for obvious data difficulties.
A big question is whether any candidate can prevent a brokered convention. Even though Joe Biden has lost 10 or more points on a national lead, the former vice president maintains a large popular vote advantage and a delegate lead in13 of the 17 states that will vote through Super Tuesday. Taken together, Biden could manage, if the model is correct, to spin 44% (642 of 1470) of pledged delegates available through March 3 out of just 28% of the national vote on average. Still, Gaffe Master Flash would have to recover serious momentum to avoid at least a second ballot at the Democratic Convention scheduled for July 2020 in Milwaukee. After his debacle last month, the debate on Wednesday may be the biggest moment in his decades as a career politician.
In Iowa, a tight race between the top four candidates suggests Biden, if the caucuses were tomorrow, would likely capture less than 25% of the vote but punch out a four-delegate win (15-11) over Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, with Sanders (10) not far behind and California Senator Kamala Harris (5) trailing but viable statewide with 14.6% of the popular vote.
In New Hampshire, Biden enjoys a six-point lead in the popular vote projection but shares the delegate lead, nine apiece, with Sanders on account of the vagaries of Democratic delegate math.
Sanders is the only candidate besides Biden that the model sees winning delegates in all 17 states and competing seriously in every one of the four major regions nationally. Sanders’ strength in every region flows out of his racially diverse, working class coalition that continues to hold strong appeal for voters under 45 years of age. The model has Sanders at 15% (the cut off by delegate contest) or greater with voters in each of the four major groups by race or ethnicity, with white, non-Hispanic voters as his weakest point (14.9%) and Hispanic voters (20.2%) as his strongest.
Elizabeth Warren would be projected currently to win no delegates in Alabama and South Carolina and just 14 delegates total in four other Southern states with large African American populations. Warren is strong in many other parts of the country, though, including now pushing Sanders (30 delegates) and Biden (34) in her home state of Massachusetts where the model would project her to pick up 27 delegates. Warren also does well on the left coast in California (98 delegates, good enough currently for second place there) but also in places like Colorado (17 of 75 delegates for third place) and even Texas (47 of 228, also for third).
Harris is projected to do reasonably well in California as well as potentially in the South. As the model was initially being built out, Harris was enjoying the crest of her post-first-debate surge, hitting an average of 15% nationally. She has since lost 3.2% on average nationally while Biden has recovered three points. Dipping below the magic 15% threshold has seen Harris go from a projection of 275 delegates or more through March 3, 2020, to just 122 delegates, almost all of them (97) from California. Even at her best, however, Harris polled fairly poorly with Hispanic, Asian, Indigenous and “Other” survey respondents. Outside the South and California, Harris’ best state in the model is Iowa, showing that a well organized, legacy media-supported campaign could see her capitalize on a traditional Democratic primary trajectory for previously not well-known candidates.
Will the Democratic Convention be brokered or contested - the “Holy Grail” of political reportage? If the #10at10 2020 Democratic Primary Model is accurate and the contest started tomorrow, the answer would be technically yes but practically no. It is extremely unlikely absent a major change in one candidate’s fortunes that any of then will reach 1885 delegates or 50% on the first ballot.
But if Biden can reach 44% by delegate total through Super Tuesday and maintain or increase that share as candidates drop out after March 3, he would almost certainly ask Harris to be his vice president; superdelegates would rubber stamp the arrangement, and the whole deal would be widely understood months ahead of Milwaukee. Brokered ahead of the convention and requiring a second ballot, yes, but not actually contested.
Yet that would not have been the conclusion 10 days ago with Harris at 15% nationally and Biden at 25%. A candidate with less than 30% support nationally breezing to a second-ballot win would sit horribly with large segments of the Democratic electorate. The #10at10 2020 Model is built around the likelihood that three or more candidates will regularly poll over 15% nationally. In that case, Biden is unlikely to maintain a 10%+ lead over the long haul.
Doug Johnson Hatlem writes on polling, elections data, and politics. For questions, comments, or to inquire about syndicating this weekly column for the 2020 cycle in your outlet, he can be contacted on Twitter @djjohnso (DMs open) or at email@example.com (subject line #10at10 Election Column).
See Other Political Commentaries.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.