If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

POLITICAL COMMENTARY

Obama whiffs on national security, blames guns

A Commentary By Charles Hurt

Well, thank goodness we have President Obama on the case. He will get to the bottom of it and finally put a stop to all this murder, madness and mayhem.

“And there also at this stage is no direct evidence that he was part of a larger plot,” a dazed Mr. Obama said haltingly as he — once again — downplayed this crazy notion that America and Western Civilization is under relentless attack from barbaric animals slaughtering humans in the name of Islam.

No “direct evidence” that Islamic jihadi Omar Mateen’s rampage in Orlando was “part of a larger plot?”

Are you Shiite-ing me???

In that sense, the commander in chief went on, “it appears to be similar to what we saw in San Bernardino — but we don’t know yet.”

Oh, phew! For a moment there I thought we were in serious trouble. I thought the savage execution of 50 revelers in Orlando might be part of a larger plot.

I mean, if that were the case and this were part of a “larger plot,” then it might kind of be the president’s fault that this stuff keeps happening over and over again. It might mean all these killings of innocent civilians from Boston to San Bernardino are, say, a national security issue. Maybe?

Part of a “larger plot” might also raise some seriously awkward questions about who exactly is doing the killing and whom exactly they are targeting and — oh, I don’t know — what exactly their motivations are.

“We don’t yet know the motivations,” Mr. Obama informed reporters gathered in the Oval Office.

Seriously? The guy is still stumped on this one?

What’s even more amazing is that the assembled reporters didn’t explode into laughter when the president said this. Or, maybe one of them could speak up and offer to pull the president aside to explain the motivation here.

The biggest reason, of course, Mr. Obama remains the only person left on the planet who doesn’t know Omar Mateen’s motivations and refuses to accept the existence of a “larger plot” against America and civilization is that if he were to accept these plainly obvious truths, then he would actually have to do something about it.

And that would be so hard.

The single worst thing he and his fellow Democrats could be forced to do today would be to take a very serious look at their insane immigration policy where anyone — literally even if you are just out of the Rio Grande, dripping wet — is welcomed with open arms.

And if you come from a country that is known as a hotbed of violent jihad, well that’s just fine, too. And then there are the Syrian refugees — Hat Tip: Obama foreign policy — where thousands are streaming in from and even government officials admit they are not able to perform complete background checks to see if they have ties to terrorist organization.

This is why Mr. Obama really doesn’t want to see the “larger plot” or acknowledge how obvious the “motivations” are. He would rather use events like this to score partisan political points and make nonsensical complaints about gun ownership in America.

“We are also going to have to think about the risks we are willing to take by being so lax in how we make very powerful firearms available to the people in this country,” Mr. Obama said. “And this is something that obviously I’ve talked about for a very long time.”

Um, okay. How about this, Mr. President: You go ahead and disarm every last terrorist now lurking in this country, plotting their next jihadi massacre and then we can talk about that.

But until you do that and start taking your job seriously, we are going to keep buying guns and stockpiling tons of ammunition so we can protect ourselves, our families and neighbors in this red hot war on America and civilization.

Charles Hurt can be reached at charleshurt@live.com; follow him on Twitter via @charleshurt.

See Other Political Commentary by Charles Hurt.

See Other Political Commentary.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.