« If it's in the news it's in our polls. «
« Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today. »
-Larry Sabato, University of Virginia« Rasmussen, an organization with fast zeitgeist reflexes.... «
-The Politico« If it's in the news it's in our polls. «
« The best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com «
-Michael Barone, The Washington Examiner`« If you really want to know what people in America think, you can't find a better place to look than Rasmussen Reports «
-Susan Estrich« If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y.Times, go with Rasmussen! »
-Mickey Kaus, Slate Magazine
Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Democratic Iowa Caucus
Iowa: Barack Obama Wins and There is No Longer a Frontrunner
Friday, January 04, 2008
Advertisement
Several weeks ago, Rasmussen Reports suggested that Hillary Clinton would remain the Democratic frontrunner following the Iowa caucuses--unless she lost by a double-digit margin. In the end, she lost by eight points and came in third (just fractionally behind John Edwards). While not quite a double-digit defeat, it was close enough and on Friday morning there was no frontrunner in the Democratic race. As expected, Iowa Democrats enjoyed the highest turnout ever for their state’s Presidential caucuses. Many commentators noted that the Democrats were far more enthusiastic than their Republican counterparts. While it’s always impossible to determine exactly what generates such enthusiasm, Rasmussen Reports polling over the past few months in Iowa provides some clues. First, Democratic caucus participants are far more confident than Republicans that their party will win the White House in November. More than nine out of ten believe their team will win it all. Second, Democrats were more satisfied with their choices than Republicans and gave their candidates more favorable reviews. There are also intangibles such as the fact that by nominating either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, their party will make history in 2008. The final Rasmussen Reports preview of the race, noted that if a large turnout actually materialized, Obama would be the beneficiary. It did, and he was. That preview also noted that “the first opportunity to measure the impact of the fallout from Iowa will be in the Rasmussen Markets data.” The results are in and they show an entirely different dynamic in the Democratic race. In terms of winning the nomination, the latest numbers show Clinton at % and Obama at %. These numbers reflect results from a prediction market, not a poll. RasmussenMarkets.com is a “futures market” that harnesses competitive passions to becomes a reliable leading indicator of upcoming events. Using a trading format where traders "buy and sell" candidates, issues, and news features, the markets correctly projected both Obama and Huckabee as the winners in Iowa. Prospects for other candidates and races are featured on the Rasmussen Markets Summary page. We invite you would to participate in the Rasmussen Markets. It costs nothing to join and add your voice to the collective wisdom of the market. Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. The Rasmussen Reports Election Edge™ Premium Service offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage available anywhere. Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade. TOP STORIES49% See GOP Takeover of Congress Next Year As Possible 42% Support Health Care Reform After Release of Pelosi's Version Americans Favor Home Buyer Tax Credit Until They Hear How Much It Costs There Is No Honor; There's Only Killing By Debra J. Saunders President Obama: One Year After Winning it All 45% for Obama, 49% Against – If Election Were Held Right Now 72% Say Health Plan Likely to Shift Employees from Private Insurance to Government Plan Generic Ballot Shows No Change This Week 55% Expect Washington Politics to Grow More Partisan Advertisement
|