If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

Why Girls In The Boy Scouts Feels Weird

A Commentary By Ted Rall

Friday, October 20, 2017

I'm not a traditionalist. Progress is good. The fact that we've always done something a certain way is no argument for continuing to do it the same way.   

I'm not a fan of single-sex environments, whether they be schools, workplaces or civic organizations. I've worked in all-male spaces (a Wall Street trading room, a taxi garage) and found the testosterone-fueled machismo toxic and thoughtless. I lived in a 99 percent female college dorm and worked in a 80 percent female office (banking consultancy); there was oppression there, too, in a more groupthink conform-or-die way (like in the movie "The Beguiled," but less murderous and more inane). The majority gender always discriminates against the minority.   

So after it was announced that girls will be allowed to join the Boy Scouts, I wondered: why does this decision feel so weird? Not so much a bridge too far -- objectively, admitting transgender Scouts earlier this year, and gays in 2013, felt more radical also exactly like the right thing to do -- as much as pointless and poorly executed.   

As an only child raised by a single mom who saw my father six hours a week, I thrived in the male energy of Boy Scouting. Someone wrote that a father is a parent who doesn't mother. That's what I loved about it. At Woodland Trails scout reservation, the troop leaders sat around drinking beer while we chased each other with pointy sticks, set fires with few regards for safety protocols and blundered into mayhem, like the time members of my patrol burned wood covered with poison oak and half the guys breathed in the smoke.   

You see what I mean about stupidity and testosterone. 

The world is mixed-gender. If the argument is that scouting prepares young people for adulthood, then gender segregation should go because it's counterproductive and sets the stage for the same-sex sexual abuse scandals that have already occurred. Seen through that lens, a merger of the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts into one mixed-gender youth organization would have made sense.   

But that's not what happened.   

Instead of striking a decisive blow against sexism, the BSA "blindsided" the Girl Scouts without consulting with the group in advance, according to the latter group's spokesperson, deploying a policy change that seems intended to boost the BSA's sagging membership by poaching girls who are more into camping than making stuff in someone's house. "If you have a mom who's really into crafts and girlie stuff and being a princess, then that's what your Girl Scout troop is going to be like. If you have a daughter who's more rough and tumble, it's not going to be a good fit," Rebecca Szetela, a mother of four from Canton, Michigan, told The New York Times.   

Oddly, the BSA, historically more politically right-wing than the relatively progressive Girl Scouts, continues to prohibit atheist and agnostic kids from joining the organization.   

Where there were once two, easy to digest options for kids, now there will be two and a half: Boy Scouts (for boys and girls), and Girl Scouts (girls only).   

BSA is about to begin a transition period. Initially there will be a parallel girls-only program within Boy Scouts in which those girls who want to do so can earn the same Eagle Scout award I got at age 16. Unless that blows up somehow, I'd expect a full gender merger after 2020 or so, followed by the BSA dropping the "B" for Boy and simply becoming Scouts of America, or just Scouting.   

That will leave the girls-only Girl Scouts, currently at 1.6 million members to the BSA's 2.3 million, out in the cold -- doomed to a slow fade or forced to fold shop and integrate their members into the Scouting Borg.   

From the insane continuation of the Boy Scouts' ban on atheists and agnostics (why force religion on an 11-year-old?) to their embarrassing decision to let Donald "You know life. You know life. So -- look at you" Trump speak at their Jamboree, to this out-of-the-blue stab in the back to Girl Scouting, it's evident that the national leadership is badly in need of clues.   

The idea of girl Boy Scouts is novel -- and it required a smooth rollout preceded by careful explanation of the pros and cons for all kids and for both organizations. Instead, a big change was dropped on our laps without any preparation or the cooperation of the girls' organization. The end result comes off as unwarranted, motivated by ill will and just plain silly.   

After the way they announced it, girls in the Boy Scouts makes almost as much sense as allowing Republicans to vote in a Democratic primary.

Ted Rall (Twitter: @tedrall) is author of "Trump: A Graphic Biography," an examination of the life of the Republican presidential nominee in comics form. You can support Ted's hard-hitting political cartoons and columns and see his work first by sponsoring his work on Patreon.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by Ted Rall.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.