If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

Speaker Ryan Follows the Lead of Speaker Reed

A Commentary By Michael Barone

Friday, April 13, 2018

One hundred nineteen years ago, Speaker of the House Thomas B. Reed announced that he was, after 22 years of service, resigning from Congress. Reed had been one of the most effective speakers ever. Barbara Tuchman's account, in "The Proud Tower," of how he neutered the minority party has entranced readers for decades now. When Democrats tried to prevent the presence of a quorum by refusing to answer roll calls, he defeated their efforts by simply noting their presence from the chair.   

In the process, Reed made policy, passing the first billion-dollar budget -- which included generous Civil War pensions -- the Sherman Antitrust Act and a big budget boost for the Navy. The civil rights bill he got the House to pass -- the last such measure for 67 years -- was blocked in the Senate.   

Why did Reed leave Congress? He disagreed with his party's president. William McKinley had reluctantly gone to war with Spain and acquired the Philippines. Reed thought that was wrong policy. He left Washington and his native Maine and moved to New York to practice law.   

The parallels aren't quite exact between the resignation in 1899 of the 32nd speaker and the announcement by the 54th speaker, Paul Ryan, Wednesday that he won't seek re-election, but they're close enough for government work. Both cared a lot about policy and were partially successful at setting it. Each had the trust of a potentially fractious caucus. Both decided to leave because they were at odds with their party's president.  

And yes, there is more to Ryan's claim that he wants to spend more time with his family than is usually the case. The Wisconsin Republican took the speakership only on condition that he would stay home on weekends rather than, like his predecessors, fly around the country fundraising.  

Like Reed with McKinley, Ryan is not at odds with Donald Trump on everything; for example, they were in sync with the tax bill that Ryan pushed through in December. But they didn't agree on much else.  

Ryan was first elected to the House in 1998, at age 28, after working as a staffer for Jack Kemp. As ranking member and chairman of the House Budget Committee, he sought Medicare entitlement reform and got just about every House Republican to sign on. He backed changes in Medicaid and food stamps, as well, and supported free trade agreements. He fashioned programs to help people out of poverty. On almost all such issues, Trump has other views -- or none at all. He has made clear that he opposes any entitlement reform, which leaves it with zero support from both Republicans and Democrats.  

In temperament, Ryan and Trump are something like polar opposites. During the 2016 presidential campaign, Ryan, the 2012 Republican vice presidential nominee, made clear his distaste for Trump's tirades and his reluctance to endorse him.   

In his own vice presidential debate against Joe Biden, the polite Ryan, taking a page from his mentor Kemp's performance against Al Gore in 1996, withstood but declined to imitate Trumpish assaults. Liberals who lament conservatives' lack of civility might profitably watch the video.   

It's possible that the realistic prospect of Democrats winning a House majority in November is one reason for Ryan's retirement. Being minority leader is no fun. "The best system," Thomas Reed said, "is to have one party govern and the other party watch."   

But governing is not very gratifying, either, when working in tandem with a president who is inconstant, inattentive and inclined to give away his negotiating position with a Fox News Channel-inspired tweet, recoiling with attacks on those who seek to carry out his wishes as best they can discern them. Undoubtedly, that's one reason that a record number of House Republicans are not seeking another term.   

Some of this discord is attributed to the fact that Trump's signature policies on trade and immigration are different from those of recent Republican nominees. But that's often the case. Bill Clinton was out of line with most Democrats on welfare reform. The same can be said about George W. Bush with most Republicans on illegal immigration and Barack Obama with most Democrats on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Those differences proved to be bearable. With Trump, it seems, not so much.   

Speaker Reed left the House before he turned 60; Speaker Ryan will leave before turning 50. When he does, someone might well say of him these words Mark Twain said about Reed: "He was transparently honest and honorable, there was no furtiveness about him, and whoever came to know him trusted him and was not disappointed."   

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and longtime co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.

COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentary.

See Other Commentaries by Michael Barone.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.