Friday, June 08, 2012
If the Wisconsin recall is truly second in importance only to the presidential race, as many media outlets have trumpeted lately, then why have those same outlets so badly neglected one of that election's most salient aspects?
As millions of dollars in dark right-wing money pour into the state to preserve Gov/ Scott Walker from his progressive opposition, it seems relevant that he and many top aides are under investigation in a campaign finance and corruption scandal that has been growing for two years.
Yet the national media have largely ignored the fascinating details of that probe -- which has already resulted in indictments, convictions and cooperation agreements implicating more than a dozen Walker aides and donors. Only readers of the local newspapers in Madison or Milwaukee would know, for instance, law enforcement documents have emerged in court during the past few days suggesting that Walker stonewalled the investigation in its initial phase.
The typical reference to the scandal in the national media notes that Tom Barrett, Walker's Democratic opponent, is seeking to "stoke suspicions" regarding the investigation, "in which former Walker aides stand accused of allegedly misappropriating campaign funds."
But the suspicions have been stoked by actual events, not campaign propaganda, including guilty pleas, immunity deals and home raids by law enforcement officials. (Last September, a team of sheriff's deputies and FBI agents raided the Madison home of Cindy Archer, a former top county official who served as the governor's deputy administration secretary until going on extended "sick leave" in 2011.) And Walker's associates stand accused of felonies that go well beyond the mere misuse of campaign funds.
Without close attention to the Wisconsin media, you might not know that a top Walker associate is currently facing charges of embezzling funds from a veteran's charity -- or that Walker's former spokeswoman just became the 13th figure in the scandal to accept an immunity deal from prosecutors.
Indeed, nearly all of Walker's highest-ranking aides and associates from his years as county executive appear to be either facing prosecution or cutting immunity deals to save themselves.
What is easy to learn about the controversial governor is his confrontational attitude toward the state's workers and perhaps his fealty to extremist billionaires like the Koch brothers. From the perspective of Fox News -- whose TV personalities resent the idea that a public school teacher who imparts facts might receive a tiny fraction of what they are paid for broadcasting lies -- these are great virtues that they praise loudly. But in the mainstream media, there has been a curious reticence in exploring the sort of scandal that ought to excite reporters, editors and producers.
Of course, Walker has benefited greatly from the secrecy surrounding the investigation, which began in May 2010 under the "John Doe" rubric at the request of Milwaukee County prosecutors. According to documents that surfaced in court only during the past week, that original decision was due, ironically, to the prosecutors' belief that Walker, then running for governor, might cooperate with them if he didn't have to worry about damage to his own career.
On May 5, 2010, an assistant district attorney filed a court petition asking to initiate a secret probe into the disappearance of thousands of dollars in donations to "Operation Freedom," an annual event for local veterans partially underwritten by county officials. Walker was then the county executive and a Republican candidate for governor who would narrowly win the following November.
If the prosecutors could open the case under the cover of secrecy provided by the state's "John Doe" statute, they hoped to obtain greater cooperation from Walker's office in providing information and documents -- which had not been made available.
"It may be the County Executive's Office is reluctant to provide information to investigators due to a fear of political embarrassment," wrote Assistant District Attorney Bruce Landgraf in the secrecy petition, as reported by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel.
The irony of this revelation was double -- not only because Walker has used the investigation's secrecy to avoid answering questions or providing records to the local media, but because he has brushed aside the convictions and immunity deals by claiming that he "initiated" the investigation and cooperated all along.
Not so incidentally, the governor has established his own legal defense fund, into which he has so far transferred at least $160,000 in campaign money. It seems increasingly likely that his biggest problems may still lie ahead.
Meanwhile, however, he has escaped the echo effect that serious national media coverage of the Wisconsin scandal would have inflicted on his immediate fortunes -- and for that he should be grateful to the editors and producers who failed to tell the real story.
Joe Conason is the editor in chief of NationalMemo.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentary.
See Other Commentary by Joe Conason.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.