If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

Do-gooders Mobilize Against Free Speech

A Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Forget all that talk about bipartisan civility. When some 200 conservatives showed up for a weekend conference hosted by the libertarian-leaning industrialist brothers Charles and David Koch in Rancho Mirage, Calif., there was no welcome wagon. Instead, seminar attendees were met by close to 1,000 activists protesting the meeting and waving banners. News reports showed a swastika and cute slogans like: "Quarantine the Kochs" and "Koch kills."

Greenpeace hired a blimp with pictures of the Koch brothers and the words "Dirty Money." The Center for American Progress mobilized. The liberal watchdog group Common Cause held a panel.

If there was soul-searching from the left-leaning activists about tone, it was not immediately apparent.

Common Cause spokesperson Mary Boyle made the reasonable point that when there is a big demonstration that is supposed to be a "peaceful and respectful event," you can't control who shows up.

That's true, but I still have to wonder why a group that says it stands for good government would protest other people, albeit conservatives, talking to each other. Or would participate in an event that culminated with activists trespassing on the Koch assembly.

Others have written on the bald hypocrisy of progressives barking about the unseemliness of what they dismiss as the "billionaire's caucus." After all, Common Cause has accepted funds from left-leaning billionaire George Soros.

The difference? Citing the Kochs' global warming skepticism and opposition to cap-and-trade legislation, Boyle answered, "Our take would be that our good government issues are not killing people ." (My italics.)

Translation: The Koch brothers are conservative.

Alas, the anti-meeting protest was the least of the organization's transgressions. Last month, Common Cause sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder asking the Department of Justice to investigate whether Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas should have recused themselves in the 2010 Citizens United case. The court found that unions and corporations could donate directly to political campaigns. The Koch brothers were on the winning side. Each of the justices once had spoken at a Koch brothers event. Launch the Inquisition.

Would it be a conflict for a justice to have talked to Common Cause? No. "We don't engage in electoral politics, so the political prohibition would not apply," explained Common Cause attorney Arn Pearson.

But Common Cause is partisan, like the Koch brothers.

Pearson could not name an instance when the Justice Department investigated a Supreme Court justice because of a ruling. Nor did he seem concerned with the invasive nature of an administration questioning the judiciary -- about a ruling that the executive branch opposed.

No worries, Pearson explained. The feds probably wouldn't have to interrogate Scalia or Thomas. They could question Koch associates or employees at resorts where the events were held.

There is no such thing as one investigation in America. If Republican-appointed justices sit in the hot seat, then be assured, Democrat-appointed justices will warm it later.

All hail the new civility.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentary

See Other Commentary by Debra J. Saunders

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.   Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.