If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.


The Doctor Is Not In

A Commentary by Susan Estrich

Not long ago, a close friend called me with an unusual request. She
and her husband were looking for a new doctor to take care of them. What
made it unusual was that they'd had the same doctor for years -- decades,

What happened to "J," I asked. Did I miss something in my otherwise
careful reading of the obits? Had he hung up his stethoscope?

None of the above. Her husband had turned 65 and was now eligible
for Medicare. Good news -- except "J" is one of the increasing number of
doctors who aren't taking "new" Medicare patients, or even old ones.

I remember the days when the health insurance industry used to
advertise that Hillary Clinton would take your doctor away. She didn't. But
a lot of people have lost their doctors anyway because of the PPO rules and,
lately, because doctors just don't want to put up with the rates Medicare

According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 97
percent of the doctors in America accept Medicare. But that is a very
deceptive number. It doesn't mean that doctors will take new Medicare
patients. According to another study, this one by the American Medical
Association, 17 percent of the doctors they surveyed restrict the number of
Medicare patients in their practices -- and that number for primary care
physicians is 31 percent. Watch out!

Some doctors get around the Medicare limits by charging for
"concierge" service. I kid you not. They charge an upfront fee for doing
things like promptly returning your calls and providing top-notch referrals,
things my own doctor (not a concierge) calls good medicine. Others just get
rid of longtime patients when they turn 65.

In an era of double-digit unemployment, it's hard to feel sorry for
people making six-figure incomes. On the other hand, many people who do work
of lesser value -- that required much less education -- make far more.

I was looking at a hospital bill of my own (from when I collapsed
on a street corner in New York City), and frankly, I was pretty horrified to
discover that the doctor who read my brain scan and concluded that, thank
God, there was no mass was paid less than the hairdresser who trims my hair.
Don't get me wrong: I like my hairdresser and value his work. But my life
doesn't depend on it.

And the doctor got more from my insurance company than he or she
would have received from Medicare. I have private insurance. Doctors get
paid, on average, 22 percent less from Medicare than they do from private
carriers. And they're prohibited by law from billing you the difference.

Obviously, we need to do something -- actually, many things -- to
rein in the skyrocketing costs of health care. As more of us get older and
the number of uninsured decreases, those costs are only going to increase.
But simply paying doctors less to do their jobs is not the answer.

Better prevention, better screening, fewer unnecessary tests and
procedures, more coordination -- all of those are important steps. But there
is something wrong when people like my friends reach their 60s and have to
find new doctors because the ones who know them best won't take care of them

I told my friend to call my doctor, Larry. He's watching his income
being slashed, but he's past caring. He is what another doctor friend of
mine calls a "dinosaur" -- a doctor who puts patients first, even at his own
expense, which is how things work today. I am grateful to have a dinosaur on
my side. But I fear that his ilk is facing extinction, and we will all
suffer for it.


See Other Political Commentaries                                                        

See Other Commentaries by Susan Estrich                                                    

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.  

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.