If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

POLITICAL COMMENTARY

Blood Libel

A Commentary by Susan Estrich

Alan Dershowitz isn't offended. He says it's OK for Sarah Palin to invoke one of the most anti-Semitic images of our time in attacking those who have been critical of her putting crosshairs over the name of the congresswoman who was later shot.

"There is nothing improper and certainly nothing anti-Semitic in Sarah Palin using the term to characterize what she reasonably believes are false accusations that her words or images may have caused a mentally disturbed individual to kill and maim. The fact that two of the victims are Jewish is utterly irrelevant to the propriety of using this widely used term," he reportedly told BigGovernment.com.

I disagree.

The best thing that can be said for Palin is that she probably didn't even know that "blood libel" refers to the longstanding accusation that Jews killed Christian babies to use their blood to make Passover matzohs. Generations of murdered Jews attest to the power of this true libel. There is simply no comparison between this terrible term and Palin's complaint that talking heads are blaming her for contributing to an environment of hate. So quick was Palin to get herself into the very fray she purports to condemn, that she didn't check what she said.

And for this, she will hit the jackpot.

Her appearance next week on Sean Hannity's show is already being promoted and is sure to be a ratings winner. Condemn the state of the public discourse all you want: My money is on her outing on Fox News (for whom she and I are both contributors) beating everything in its time slot combined.

I don't blame Palin for the tragic shooting in Tucson. The man who pulled the trigger is to blame. Culpability is individual.

I do blame her for not acting like a leader in the days since. Not knowing what "blood libel" means is bad enough. But it's far worse not knowing that in times of national crisis you don't respond to the cranks; you rise above them and bring the country together, as the president later did.

And I blame those who let her get away with it.

Palin keeps asking to be taken seriously as a future president, even if only to maintain the bright lights and big fees. But she behaves like every other striving talk-show host, eager to get in the good jab, the good line, the zinger -- even if the end result of an endless cycle of such zingers is a level of political discourse that is disgraceful if not also dangerous.

If this is, in retrospect, just another chapter in building the career of Sarah Palin, television talker, international toastmaster, seven-figure speaker for hire, there is no doubt that it will be counted as a success. Her comments have come to play a central role in the story: The liberal media have once again vilified her. She has once again stood up for herself, refusing to let them get away with it, holding her ground and hitting the ratings jackpot.

For some purposes, this is a very good story. Running for president is not one of them.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by Susan Estrich.  

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. 

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.