If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.


When Inequality Is Fatal for Men

A Commentary By Daniel McCarthy

Equality has always been an American preoccupation, right from the words "all men are created equal" in the Declaration of Independence.

Yet even that phrase is not egalitarian enough by today's lights; feminists have long objected to the gendered language of "all men."

Thomas Jefferson didn't mean to commit a microaggression; in 1776, "all men" meant women, too.

We know this because the Founding Fathers -- must we say Founding Parents? -- argued about the mismatch between their universal philosophy and the endemic inequalities of their time, with Abigail Adams asking her husband John to "remember

the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors" when the time came for America to declare independence.

Today, however, men and women are becoming increasingly unequal -- and in one of the most basic measures of well-being, it's men who keep falling further behind.

Life expectancy has declined for all Americans in recent years.

It's fallen more for men than for women, though, producing the largest gender gap in nearly two decades.

According to a study in JAMA Internal Medicine, as of 2021 women were outliving men by 5.8 years.

As much as postmodern academics and progressive political activists may deny it, there are natural differences between the sexes, and the mere fact that women live longer is not so surprising.

For one thing, men are disproportionately employed in the nation's most hazardous jobs, including as loggers, roofers, construction workers, aircraft pilots and steel workers.

And if a male propensity for risk-taking makes men more successful in certain executive and entrepreneurial roles, it also leads to more men and boys dying young of misadventure and accident.

But the gap in longevity has widened by a full year since 2010, when it was at an historic minimum of 4.8 years.

Human nature hasn't changed in that time; rather, something has changed in America to make it a deadlier place for men.

COVID contributed twice over, to the extent that the disease may have affected men more severely and they, in turn, were less inclined to take its flu-like symptoms seriously.

Deaths from despair have ravaged both sexes, but suicide and overdose do exacerbate the gender disparity, with men at greater risk of dying from each of those causes.

Unsurprisingly, men are also more likely to die by homicide, and when violent crime escalates, male life expectancy will predictably fall.

But there are less obvious forces in play, too.

Men are less likely to go to college or complete a degree, which in an increasingly service-oriented and knowledge-based economy translates into worse life and career prospects -- conditions that foster deaths from despair.

Whether ironically or cynically, progressives can be conservative and hidebound in their assumptions about inequality: They presume that whoever was more-than-equal in the past must still be privileged today, and so the one kind of inequality that

doesn't prick the progressive conscience is whatever harms groups that were formerly better off.

Income inequality and racial inequality are outrages that fill the streets with protesters from Occupy Wall Street or Black Lives Matter -- but there won't be any protests over men's worsening life prospects.

Then again, the last thing men need is to be designated as another victim group.

Right now, the very concept of manhood is under attack from two directions: from those on the left who see masculinity as inherently "toxic" and those on the right who idolize the likes of Andrew Tate -- overgrown adolescent hedonists without announce of self-control, let alone any traditionally manly moral responsibilities for family or others.

If life is unfair to men, the masculine remedy is not to complain about unfairness but to be tough enough, and mature enough, to endure and prosper despite inequality.

That doesn't mean that men don't need help, especially when facing despair, but a sense of social or political victimhood is only destructive; what kills men is not something that can be solved with another equality-demanding movement.

As dedicated as our Founding Fathers were to equality -- even to the point of recognizing in principle, if not in practice, that the words of the Declaration applied to women and black people as well as to white men -- they did not believe that everyone could or should be equal in every way.

Men and women will forever be different, and the ways they differ will not always be favorable to men.

Rather than seeing this as a betrayal of equality, or overlooking it as a politically incorrect fact, the best response is to treat men as men and women as women in their virtues and hardships alike -- and look to men's strengths for the answer to their plight.

Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review. To read more by Daniel McCarthy, visit www.creators.com


See Other Political Commentary.

See Other Commentaries by Daniel McCarthy.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.