Comparing National Polls in 2016 and 2020
A Commentary By Alan I. Abramowitz
Biden’s lead has been similar to Clinton’s, but it has been more stable.
KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE
— In aggregate, Joe Biden’s national lead over Donald Trump so far this year is very similar to the lead Hillary Clinton held over Trump in the first half of 2016.
— However, Biden’s lead has been more stable.
2016 vs. 2020 in the national polls
With less than five months left in the 2020 election campaign, former Vice President Joseph Biden continues to lead President Donald Trump in both national and swing state polling. In the past few weeks, Biden has widened his lead in the RealClearPolitics national poll average from less than six points to about eight points.
Of course, astute poll watchers will recall that four years ago, Hillary Clinton also led Donald Trump in most national and swing state polls. In the end, though, Trump won the election by narrowly defeating Clinton in several key swing states. So how does Biden’s current situation compare with Clinton’s in 2016?
A close analysis of national polling in 2016 and 2020 based on data compiled by RealClearPolitics indicates that Biden’s lead over Trump has been only slightly larger than Clinton’s lead over Trump between January and early June. However, Biden’s lead has been much more consistent. The data for both years are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 shows the aggregate data for Clinton vs. Trump both through mid-June of 2016 and also for the entire election year, as well as Biden vs. Trump for 2020 so far; Table 2 shows the monthly average Democratic lead for the 2016 election year as well as 2020 so far.
Table 1: Comparing 2016 national polls to 2020 polls
Table 2: Average Democratic lead by month, 2016 vs. 2020
Notes: Polls included in the mid-June calculations are those with field dates before June 10 in both 2016 and 2020. In Table 2, the June 2016 entry includes all polls with a field date ending in June, while the June 2020 entry only includes polls released through the morning of Monday, June 15.
Source: RealClearPolitics; research by author. Polls included are those with field dates before June 10 in both 2016 and 2020.
Joe Biden has held an average lead of 5.9 points over Donald Trump in 72 national polls between January and early June. Hillary Clinton held an average lead of only 4.7 points in 221 national polls between January and early November, but her average lead was 5.7 points in 44 polls between January and early June. However, Biden’s lead has varied very little from month to month, ranging from 5.0 points in January to 7.7 points thus far in June. In contrast, Clinton’s lead varied from only 2.4 points in July to 10 points in March.
The much greater volatility of Clinton’s lead is reflected by the standard deviation statistic, which measures variability. The month-to-month standard deviation of Clinton’s lead was 2.3 percentage points for the entire year and 2.8 percentage points between January and early June. Both are far larger than the standard deviation of 1.0 percentage points for Biden’s lead between January and early June 2020.
The greater consistency of Biden’s lead compared with Clinton’s can also be seen by comparing the percentage of polls in which each finished ahead of Trump. During 2016, Hillary Clinton led Donald Trump in 84% of national polls while Trump led in 12%. Between January and early June, Clinton led in 84% of national polls while Trump led in 14%. In contrast, thus far in 2020, Joe Biden has led Trump in 94% of national polls while Trump has led in only 1% — just one poll out of 72.
Hillary Clinton led Donald Trump in the large majority of national polls in 2016. However, the magnitude of that lead varied considerably over time. This variability may reflect that fact that in an open seat contest like 2016, the choices of voters can be influenced more by the candidates’ campaigns and the changing news background. In contrast, Joseph Biden’s lead over Donald Trump has been far more consistent in 2020. This consistency may reflect the fact that Donald Trump is now running as an incumbent with a proven track record. When an incumbent like Trump is running for reelection, the election is mainly a referendum on the incumbent’s performance. The candidates’ campaigns and the developments in the news are probably less important.
Voters’ opinions of Donald Trump’s performance have been extraordinarily stable throughout his presidency with negative evaluations generally outweighing positive evaluations. That is the main reason why Trump has consistently trailed his Democratic challenger in the polls. The fact that the ratio of negative to positive evaluations of Trump’s performance has increased in the past few weeks probably also explains why Biden has been enjoying his largest margins in national polls at any time in 2020.
Alan I. Abramowitz is the Alben W. Barkley Professor of Political Science at Emory University and a senior columnist with Sabato’s Crystal Ball. His latest book, The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump, was released last year by Yale University Press.
See Other Commentary by Dr. Alan Abramowitz.
See Other Political Commentary.
This article is reprinted from Sabato's Crystal Ball.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.