Advertisement
|
Advertisement
56% Support Enforcement Only Immigration Approach
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Advertisement
Fifty-six percent (56%) of American adults favor an enforcement-only approach to immigration reform. Only 29% are opposed. However, support falls sharply when “a path to citizenship” for illegal aliens already in the United States is added to the mix. Just 42% support the more “comprehensive” approach while 44% are opposed. This proposal was similar to a “grand bargain” announced by Senator Arlen Specter earlier in the week. Specter’s outline included a provision to add 6,000 border patrol agents along the US-Mexican border. That would double the number of border agents and is supported by 62% of Americans. Only 24% are opposed. The public is more evenly divided on a far more aggressive approach to add 100,000 border patrol agents. Forty-three percent (43%) favor such an approach while 37% are opposed. Republicans favor this approach by a 2-to-1 margin. Democrats and those not affiliated with either major party are evenly divided. Earlier surveys have consistently found strong popular support for another aspect of Specter’s proposal—strict penalties on those who hire illegal aliens. A survey released last week showed that most Americans continue to believe that controlling the border should be the primary focus of immigration reform. The enforcement-only approach was defined as a proposal to “build a fence along the Mexican border, assign more border patrol agents, and impose strict penalties on anyone who hires illegal aliens. The proposal would do nothing to legalize the status of illegal aliens already in the country.” After hearing that, survey respondents were asked a follow-up question: “A different proposal has been made that also includes a fence along the Mexican border, more border patrol agents, strict penalties on anyone who hires illegal aliens. This proposal, however, would also offer illegal aliens a path to citizenship if they pay back taxes and other fines. Would you favor or oppose this proposal?” Rasmussen Reports conducts ongoing surveys measuring the attitudes of Americans on the news of the day. Recent surveys have asked about the DC Madam, gun control, the Supreme Court decision on partial-birth abortion, the FDA and food safety, the CIA and George Tenet’s book, and the subpoena’s issued to Condoleezza Rice. The latest updates can be found on the Rasmussen Reports home page. Rasmussen Reports also regularly tracks public attitudes towards Congress, the War on Terror, and other topics. Rasmussen Reports also continuously updates favorability ratings and general election match-ups for all Democratic and Republican Presidential candidates along with ratings for Members of Congress, Other Political Figures, and Journalists. Rasmussen Reports releases updated polling data on the Democrat Nomination Process every Monday and on the Republican contest every Tuesday. Results for the Generic Congressional Ballot are updated monthly. Crosstabs available for Premium Members only. Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. The Rasmussen Reports Election Edge™ Premium Service offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage available anywhere. Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
Survey of 1,000 Adults
TOP STORIESPublic Support for Sotomayor Falls After Supreme Court Reversal Plans for General Motors Might Run Afoul of Public Opinion 85% Say Parents Should Have Right to Spank Children, 30% Say Teachers Should Be Able to Spank Students Republicans Lead Again on Congressional Ballot Massachusetts: 26% Consider State’s Health Care Reform a Success Americans Still Embrace Ideals from Declaration of Independence 44% Nationwide Have Unfavorable View of Franken 45% of Voters Say One-Party Rule Bad for U.S., 27% Disagree 56% Don’t Want To Pay More To Fight Global Warming Advertisement
|
||||||||||||||||