On July 4, a Message for Patriots of all Persuasions
A Commentary by Joe Conason
Tuesday, July 08, 2014
When the flags fly proudly on the Fourth of July, I remember what my late father taught me about love of country. Much as he despised the scoundrels and pretenders he liked to call "jelly-bellied flag flappers," after a line in a favorite Rudyard Kipling story, he was deeply patriotic. It is a phrase that aptly describes the belligerent chicken hawk who never stops squawking -- someone like Dick Cheney or Rush Limbaugh.
Like many who volunteered for the U.S. Army in World War II, my dad never spoke much about his four tough years of military service, which brought him under Japanese bombardment in the Pacific theater. But eventually there came a time when he attached to his lapel a small eagle-shaped pin known as a "ruptured duck" -- a memento given to every veteran. With this proof of service, he demonstrated that as a lifelong liberal, he loved his country as much as any conservative.
Would such a gesture resonate today? For decades right-wingers have sought to establish a near-monopoly on patriotic expression, all too often with the dumb collusion of some of its adversaries on the left. On this holiday, when we celebrate the nation's revolutionary founding, we need to remind ourselves just how hollow that right-wing tactic is and always has been. Only our historical amnesia permits the right -- infested with neo-Confederates and others of dubious loyalty -- to assert an exclusive franchise on the flag, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the whole panoply of national symbols.
In the light of history, it should be plain that progressives are fully entitled to a share of America's heritage -- indeed, perhaps more than its right-wing rivals. Let's begin at the official beginning.
Although "right" and "left" didn't define political combat at that time on these shores, there isn't much doubt that behind the American Revolution, and in particular the Declaration of Independence, was not only a colonial elite but a cabal of left-wing radicals as well.
How else to describe Samuel Adams and Thomas Paine, the revolutionary idealists who declared their contempt for monarchy and aristocracy? It is true that many of their wealthier and more cautious comrades in the Continental Congress disdained Adams as a reckless adventurer "of bankrupt fortune" and Paine as a rabble-rousing scribbler? But popular democracy was a wildly radical doctrine in colonial times, tamed in the writing of the Constitution by the new nation's land-owning elites and slaveholders.
That era's right-wingers were the Tories -- colonists who remained loyal to the British crown, opposed change, and, in their assistance to the King George III's occupying army, were exactly the opposite of patriots. Only after two centuries of ideological shifting can tea party "constitutionalists" claim the Republican faith of the Founding Fathers is "conservative."
The Civil War was just as plainly a struggle between left and right, between patriots and ... well, in those days the Confederate leaders were deemed traitors (a term avoided since then out of a decent concern for Southern sensibilities). Academics dispute the war's economic and social basis, but there is no doubt that the 19th-century left sought to abolish slavery and preserve the Union, while their right-wing contemporaries fought to extend slavery and destroy the Union.
Reverence for the Confederacy remains an emotional touchstone for right-wing Southern politicians and intellectuals (not to mention the Ku Klux Klan, assorted neo-Nazis and many activists in the tea party). All of these disreputable elements denigrate Abraham Lincoln, our greatest president, and promote nostalgia for the plantation, sometimes known as "the Southern way of life."
The latest example is Chris McDaniel, the defeated tea party candidate for the Senate in Mississippi, a flag-waver if ever there were one -- except when he was delivering fiery speeches to the secessionist Sons of Confederate Veterans. At the risk of offending every "conservative" who runs around with a Stars and Bars bumper sticker, it is hard to see how his conduct qualifies as American patriotism.
Still another inglorious episode in the annals of the right preceded World War II. The America First movement that opposed U.S. intervention against Adolf Hitler camouflaged itself with red, white and blue but proved to be a haven for foreign agents who were plotting against the United States. (Philip Roth brilliantly depicted this sinister campaign in the novel "The Plot Against America.") Although communists and pacifists had opposed American entry into the war for their own reasons, the broad-based left of the New Deal coalition understood the threat from the Axis very early. After Pearl Harbor, most conservatives honorably joined the war effort, but some continued to promote defeatism and appeasement. The historical roots of postwar conservatism -- the "Old Right" of Joseph McCarthy and Pat Buchanan, the Buckley family and the Koch brothers -- can be traced to those prewar Nazi sympathizers.
What does true patriotism mean today? Do you truly love your country if you are a corporate leader hiding billions of dollars in profits offshore or insisting on the declining wages that have ruined the American dream? Do you love your country if you demand the right to pollute its air and water and despoil its countryside, no matter the cost to future generations? Do you love your country when you scheme to deprive your fellow citizens of the right to vote, which so many died to preserve?
Somehow the right-wingers righteously wrap themselves in Old Glory, as if our heritage belongs to them alone. On this holiday, and every other day, it surely does not.
To find out more about Joe Conason and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by Joe Conason.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection,
publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events
in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence,
we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions,
sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics
provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day.
If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a
daily update newsletter and various media outlets
across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll
and commentaries are available for free to the general public.
Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year
that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections,
consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers,
Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs
and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.