Friday, January 02, 2009
Barack Obama's pick for commerce secretary, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, vows to create millions of technology jobs that can't be outsourced. Sounds good, particularly in this melting economy.
On the other hand, Richardson supports expanding the H-1B visa program, which had greased the departure of good-paying tech jobs to lower-wage countries. The program lets U.S. companies employ up to 65,000 temporary foreign software designers, engineers and other skilled professionals a year.
When the workers go home, the jobs often go with them. That's a problem for American workers. For the businesses that abuse the program, it's a plan.
Indian outsourcing companies account for almost 80 percent of the visa petitions approved for the top 10 participants in the program, according to BusinessWeek. The Indian commerce minister has called H-1B "the outsourcing visa."
For the record, Obama also backs issuing more H-1B visas, as does his pick for labor secretary, Hilda Solis.
Many American companies have a genuine need for specialized skills from abroad. And the H-1B visa can usefully serve as a bridge for foreign graduates of U.S. universities awaiting their green cards.
But it also helps companies replace their skilled American workers with cheaper foreign labor. An example:
At the drug maker Pfizer's Connecticut campuses, American information technology (IT) workers train their H-1B understudies. Pfizer's apparent long-range plan is to have some of these jobs performed by guest workers in the United States and others taken overseas, according to The New London Day.
It's baffling that the United States would have a program to hasten this humiliating scenario for its workers. And the deeper mystery is why there is so little resistance to it, especially since there are 3 million IT workers in this country. Certainly in this time of massive layoffs there can be no pretense of a labor shortage.
"IT workers make up the largest of our science and engineering occupations," outsourcing expert Ron Hira tells me, "and they essentially have no representation in Washington."
Not so Microsoft, Google, Intel and other heavy users of the H-1B program. They belong to Compete America, a well-funded lobby. Compete America's spokesman is Oracle executive Robert Hoffman. Oracle happens to own I-Flex, a large outsourcing firm. The companies' collective plaint is that they suffer a desperate shortage of skilled workers.
"But no one has to demonstrate that there is a shortage," notes Hira, a professor of public policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology. The median base pay for IT professionals fell to $73,000 this year from $74,000 last year. "If wages are dropping, that's an indication there's not a shortage," Hira adds.
Les French is the president of WashTech, the Seattle-based local of the Communications Workers of America. French sees a legitimate need for the H-1B program and doesn't automatically oppose raising the cap on the visas. He just wants to stop the program's abuses.
A Senate bill sponsored by Illinois Democrat Richard Durbin and Iowa Republican Charles Grassley would help do that. It would raise the floor pay for H-1B workers and require companies to make an active search of American workers before they turn to visas. And it provides for oversight of companies using the program.
French says he is "a little nervous" about Obama and his team. "I think there's going to be an uphill battle in educating the administration as well as members of Congress."
In the meantime, someone should ask Gov. Richardson exactly what tech jobs can't be outsourced. Moving skilled U.S. jobs offshore may be a trend that's already taken off, but why should Washington provide the airplanes? Perhaps that should be question No. 1.
COPYRIGHT 2008 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.
See Other Political Commentary.
See Other Commentaries by Froma Harrop.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.