If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

Is Hacking Your Spouse's E-Mail Truly a Crime?

A Commentary by Debra J. Saunders

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Michigan prosecutor Jessica R. Cooper's bio boasts that she is a "pioneer in the world of women in the law." As it turns out, she is a pioneer in the world of busybodies in the law as well. Cooper is the Oakland County prosecutor who charged Leon Walker, 33, with a felony for hacking into his now ex-wife's e-mail, as he suspected that she was having an affair.

This sorry episode began when Walker logged into his wife, Clara's, Gmail account. What he saw led him to believe his wife was having an affair with her second husband, who, according to news reports, had been arrested on charges of beating Clara in front of her son from her first marriage.

It gets messier. Walker reportedly printed the e-mails and then gave them to the first husband. In February 2009, Oakland County authorities arrested Walker.

"The guy is a hacker," Cooper explained to the Detroit Free Press. Cooper has maintained that Walker, a computer technician for Oakland County, used his skill to download the e-mails, and then used them "in a very contentious way."

Nonsense, says Walker's attorney, Leon Weiss. Cooper didn't use his training to get into the Gmail. The couple shared the computer, which Walker had bought, and Clara left her password lying around in their home.

While the Michigan hacking law may not specifically exempt spouses, common sense should hold some sway in this case. When you live with someone, you give up a legal expectation of privacy.

When you're married, your spouse, like a parent, has a legal right to see what is in your home. Ask any self-respecting wife. You come home with lipstick on your collar, your wife has a right to look for incriminating evidence.

If you don't want to get caught, do a better job of covering your tracks.

In legal terms, Weiss put it this way: "You do give up a good amount of your privacy when you're in the marital home. If you want to draw personal lines, that's between the two of you. A violation of personal lines should be dealt with in the relationship."

Besides, if you don't want government in your bedroom, you certainly don't want Big Brother mediating your marital issues.

The courthouse would never close.

If Walker were a woman, I don't think there's a jury in America that would convict. As a wronged husband, doing what many a wronged spouse would do, Walker should have little to fear -- yet if he's convicted, he faces five years in prison.

"The ones you should win make you the most nervous," Weiss confided.

I didn't hear back from Cooper. So let me offer this in her defense: Two judges have ruled in favor of letting the Feb. 7 trial proceed.

Doesn't make it right.

As George Washington University law Professor Jonathan Turley blogged, "We have seen the gradual over-criminalization of America where every act -- great or small -- has been translated into some form of crime."

And: "If this type of intrusion is criminal, millions of people would be felons. Without some evidence of a collateral crime such as identity theft, the prosecutors should have left this to the divorce courts. My assumption is that Ms. Cooper has other crimes to prosecute in Michigan."

Cooper called Walker a "hacker." I wonder what she would call a prosecutor's office that chose to threaten a jealous husband and fearful father with five years in prison by trolling for a law clearly enacted for other purposes. "Hacker" maybe. But in this story, that type of hacking is not a crime.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentary  

See Other Commentary by Debra J. Saunders .  

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.