Why The Double Standard for the Auto and Finance Industries?
An Analysis By Scott Rasmussen
Voters opposed bailouts for both the auto industry and the financial industry, but the federal government provided support for both. Some critics—particularly those who favor the auto industry—have noted that the terms and tone of the bailouts were markedly different, however.
Most dramatically, the government pushed out Rick Wagoner, the chairman and chief executive officer of General Motors. No similar actions were taken against financial industry leaders.
The difference can most likely be explained by the 43-point gap between 12% and 55%.
Twelve percent (12%) represents the number of voters who say their finances would be impacted if General Motors filed for bankruptcy.
Fifty-five percent (55%) represents the number of voters who belong to the Investor Class by owning at least $5,000 worth of stocks, bonds and mutual funds.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? Sign up now. If it's in the news, it's in our polls.) Rasmussen Reports updates also available on Twitter.
In an environment where people are opposed to taxpayer-funded bailouts, the safest political course is to hope that the cost of the bailouts is overwhelmed by the benefits of a rising stock market. At the same time, when voters want accountability, why not show it by getting tough with a company whose worst-case showing would directly impact just 12% of the nation?
Americans are still opposed to bailouts, even though most believe it’s likely GM or Chrysler, the auto companies seeking bailouts, will not survive the next few years. For now, the issue is whether Chrysler can find a partner in 30 days to stay in business and whether GM can avoid bankruptcy by producing a reorganization plan in 60 days that satisfies the president's auto task force and releases more bailout loan money. Seventy-six percent (76%) say it’s possible for the economy to recover even if GM does not.
See Other Analysis By Scott Rasmussen
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.