If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

POLITICAL COMMENTARY

How Harry Got His Groove Back

A Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid spent the weekend trying to finesse the news that he told "Game Change" authors Mark Halperin and John Heilemann in 2008 that he believed Barack Obama could win the White House, as he was a "light-skinned" African-American "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one." Reid opined that Obama's race would help him more than hurt him win the Democratic nomination.

Some liberals have come to the defense of the pasty-faced white guy who speaks with his foot in his mouth, even when he doesn't want to.

They say that Reid simply was saying what many people think, with no racist intent. Others argue that the matter is settled, as President Obama accepted Reid's apology.

OK, but if Reid said nothing wrong, why did he call Obama to apologize for his "poor choice of words" and for "offending any and all Americans, especially African-Americans"? And why did Obama release a statement announcing that he "accepted Harry's apology without question" -- instead of stating there was no need for an apology?

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele has called on Reid to resign his Senate leadership post, just as Trent Lott resigned his GOP leadership post in 2002 after he praised the 1948 segregationist presidential campaign of the late Sen. Strom Thurmond at Thurmond's 100th birthday party. An RNC missive denounced the Democrats' "double standard."

They forget that Republicans were the main force in pushing for Lott's resignation. Or, as a headline in the Dec. 16, 2002 online version of the conservative Weekly Standard exclaimed, "Someone please stop him."

It was different in 2007 when then-Sen. Joe Biden said of Obama in 2007, "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy." Biden later said he regretted offending people, and went on to become Obama's running mate.

And let us not forget the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who was caught on a Fox News hot microphone dissing Obama for "talking down to black people." Jackson also said he wanted to snip Obama's privates.

Two worse examples: California Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante used the wrong n-word at a Black History Month event in 2001. Nonetheless, the Democrat was re-elected. Ditto Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.V., a former Ku Klux Klan member, who used the n-word to refer to whites without becoming the focus of a civil rights campaign to defeat him.

I won't whine that it's not fair that Democrats can get away with racially insensitive remarks. It's just a fact of life that the Al Sharptons of the world will give Democrats the benefit of the doubt when they inadvertently say what they think, while they will use gaffes as a club against Republicans. When Republicans try to use gaffes against the Dems, they fail.

The biggest losers are those African-Americans who, when applying for a job or shopping, have to deal with insidious prejudice far worse than the word play that has become the chew toy of partisan dogs.

Reid told a press conference Monday that he does not want to "dwell" on this brouhaha, but will "continue doing my work for the African-American community." Actually, Senator, I think you've done enough.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentary

See Other Commentary by Debra J. Saunders

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.