Wednesday, February 05, 2020
How much more evidence do we need to compile before the federal government protects our children and fully deplatforms Google from American public schools?
The Silicon Valley behemoth has already admitted it illegally collected children's personal information on YouTube without parental consent, mines students' browsing habits and emails, and tracks kids' locations, audio and search history through Google educational apps and logons that are required for millions of students to participate in public schools.
Well, there's more. Much more. Let us review the most recent alarming disclosures that expose grave public health and safety threats posed by the near-trillion-dollar company with its tentacles tightly wrapped around our kids' eyeballs, brains and behavioral data.
This week, the tech giant admitted for the first time that its data export service, Google Takeout, had accidentally sent the private information and videos of untold thousands of users to other strangers' accounts. The breach occurred in late November, but users only started receiving notices and apologies on Monday -- nearly three months later.
"We are notifying people about a bug that may have affected users who used Google Takeout to export their Google Photos content between November 21 and November 25," an email sheepishly explained. "These users may have received either an incomplete archive, or videos -- not photos -- that were not theirs. We fixed the underlying issue and have conducted an in-depth analysis to help prevent this from ever happening again. We are very sorry this happened."
Can you imagine a similar breach of minors' photos and videos stored on students' Google Drives or Chromebooks or smartphones or home computers used to log on to mandatory learning management systems integrated with Google, such as Canvas or Schoology or Blackboard? It's easy if you try.
Will "upsy-daisy" suffice when schoolkids' pictures, embedded with geolocation data, end up on a friendly neighborhood registered sex offender's Google Photos album?
Two months ago, The Wall Street Journal reported that Google had secretly harvested "tens of millions of medical records" with identifying names, lab results, diagnoses, immunization records and prescriptions from thousands of hospitals across 21 states. "Project Nightingale" was a partnership with Ascension health system to build a search tool and data analytics using machine-learning algorithms. At least 150 Google employees had access to confidential patient data. Amazon, Microsoft and IBM have acquired private health data as well. It's a massive Big Tech bonanza.
The implications for selling off children's private health information are chilling. Like federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act protections for patients, federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act protections have been sabotaged by "public-private partnerships" between government education officials and tech companies with insatiable appetites for data.
Will "trust us" cut it when Google gets access to your kids' school-based health records?
Meet "Gaggle." Fully integrated with Google Apps for Education and designated as a Google "Premier Partner," this snooping system is marketed to school districts as a "safety" mechanism for students. Through 24/7 monitoring of kids' online use, Gaggle "alerts school officials when students show signs of self-harm, depression, thoughts of suicide, substance abuse, cyberbullying, unhealthy relationships, and credible threats of violence against others."
Privacy experts for a pro-digital learning nonprofit called Common Sense determined that it is "unclear" whether Gaggle "allows users to control how their data are displayed," "whether this product allows parents to withdraw consent for the further collection of their child's information" and "whether this product provides parental consent notice."
Despite all of that uncertainty, 1,400 school districts use Gaggle to mine "social media, browsing history, email, homework documents, uploads, chats, pictures, and calendars" -- and put untold tens of thousands of students at risk of privacy breaches that could do damage for a lifetime.
Last spring, Google reported at an education conference that it had started making its cloud platform program accessible to K-12 school districts. Evergreen, Washington, public schools chief Derrick Brown bragged about his district's data-mining pilot program with Google. "We have tons of data in our school districts," he is quoted outlining in Education Week, citing information gathered through "student information systems, instructional software programs, online surveys of children's social-emotional well-being, and special-needs students' individualized education plans."
"All that data needs to go in a container," Brown explained. And that container will be Google Cloud Platform. Now, imagine questionnaires and tests stored in the G-container measuring "social-emotional well-being" of children and their families according to politically correct ideology. Imagine being a parent who objects to mandatory vaccine laws or who holds "America first" views deemed "extremist" and "hateful" or who stores guns responsibly in your home -- information that is not the business of a school district or Silicon Valley giant. Where's the protection for such families? What's the academic justification for gathering it?
Brown hasn't bothered to figure out yet how parents will be able to maintain control over the data or contemplating privacy concerns. Why bother? It's free!
What possible academic benefits could outweigh the real harm posed by school officials' addiction to "free" Google services? Understand this before it's too late: When the educational products are "free," it's our children who are the products -- or the prey.
Michelle Malkin 's email address is MichelleMalkinInvestigates@protonmail.com. To find out more about Michelle Malkin and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2020 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by Michelle Malkin.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.