Why Democrats Can't Do Better Than Kamala Harris in 2028

   There are only two lanes to the Democratic presidential nomination two years from now, and one of them is already blocked -- by Kamala Harris.

   Get ready for the Kamala comeback, followed, in all likelihood, by a replay of her crushing defeat by the Republican nominee.

   Believe it or not, the ex-VP occupies what counts as the "center lane" within the party, and for most of the last three decades that's the one that's led to the nomination.

   Republicans used to be the party of orderly succession, even if the candidate whose turn had come looked like a certain loser: think Bob Dole in '96.

   But recently, it's been Democrats who've tended to pick a party elder as their nominee:

   Al Gore, as a sitting VP, might not have been remarkable in 2000, but in '04 it was John Kerry, in '16 Hillary Clinton and in 2020 Joe Biden -- with only Barack Obama butting ahead of the line in 2008.

   Democrats like a known quantity, a reliable liberal who isn't too overtly radical; the radicalism can wait until after Election Day.

   So they're leaning to running Harris again, even if donors aren't happy about it: They blew nearly $2 billion on her campaign and aligned PAC's in 2024, only for Harris to lose every battleground state to Trump.

   It won't be donors who decide the party's 2028 nominee, though, and ordinary Democrats actually find Harris reassuring.

   She's a familiar face, after all, commanding practically universal name recognition.

   Harris checks the identity-politics boxes that may be as important as winning to Democratic primary voters: Their ticket must have a woman, and it can't be all white.

   And after being vetted as a VP and undergoing the trial-by-fire of the '24 campaign, Harris isn't likely to surprise voters with any extremist tattoos or sexual-assault allegations -- things that can't be taken for granted among Democrats nowadays.

   Then there's the revenge motive: What better way to repudiate the Trump era and reverse the '24 humiliation than by making the woman he defeated president?

   Democratic primary voters are still smarting from Hillary Clinton's drubbing in 2016: by 2028, the election of America's first female president will have been postponed 12 long years, and feminists in the party aren't willing to wait any longer

   These are the reasons Harris tops almost all polls of 2028 Democratic hopefuls, with an 11.6-point lead in the RealClearPolitics polling aggregate as of mid-July.

   "She comes in with 99 percent name ID and everyone else is going to have to raise money and buy it," a former Harris aide tells New York's David Freedlander.

   The donors might prefer just about anyone else, yet they'd have to pour an enormous amount of cash into another candidate just to make him or her recognizable.

   This has led one longtime Democratic strategist with donors' ears to welcome the inevitable: "I hope she runs," Alex Hoffman told New York, "Because then she will lose and we will never have to hear from her again. She will never win an election at a national scale. Never."

   But if Harris is hopeless, why does she seem inevitable?

   She has seniority no one else can match, but what about the other lane that leads to the nomination?

   That's the left lane -- the far left lane.

   The one Bernie Sanders occupied in 2020 and 2016, and that a candidate like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez might fill in 2028.

   Young Dems keep moving leftward, with the Democratic Socialists of America making deeper inroads into the party.

   Harris is not nearly left-wing enough for them -- but then, anyone who is would be upsetting to the old guard.

   It's not that the old-timers aren't also well to the left on economics, but they don't want to be labeled "socialists"-- while the insurgent left is proud of the brand.

   The party's mainstream wants to have it both ways on the Israel-Palestine conflict -- while the young left, increasingly, is explicit about its anti-Zionism.

   There are still enough baby boomers and suburbanites in the Democratic Party to make the left lane an unlikely road to the nomination. For now.

   Harris can expect a challenge from the left, but the party is still probably one more presidential cycle away from nominating someone who openly represents where Democrats are headed.

   In fact, a Harris defeat in 2028 would be the perfect prelude to the socialist and anti-Zionist left's takeover, discrediting the old guard for forfeiting the election to Donald Trump's successor.

   Insider Democrats know Kamala Harris is a terrible candidate, but the party they built can't tell her no -- even if this is the last nomination they get to make before DSA takes over.

   Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review. To read more by Daniel McCarthy, visit www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2026 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentary.

See Other Commentaries by Daniel McCarthy.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.