« If it's in the news it's in our polls. «
« Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today. »
-Larry Sabato, University of Virginia« Rasmussen, an organization with fast zeitgeist reflexes.... «
-The Politico« If it's in the news it's in our polls. «
« The best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com «
-Michael Barone, The Washington Examiner`« If you really want to know what people in America think, you can't find a better place to look than Rasmussen Reports «
-Susan Estrich« If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y.Times, go with Rasmussen! »
-Mickey Kaus, Slate Magazine
Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Obama Reverses Course on Public Funding
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Advertisement
Barack Obama reversed course today and said he will not rely on public funding for his presidential campaign, breaking a pledge he made to pursue such an arrangement with his Republican rival John McCain. But on the basis of a Rasmussen Reports national survey at the time of that pledge, the Democrat's decision is not likely to prompt much public reaction unless McCain chooses to make an issue of it. Over half of likely voters could not even guess which candidate had recently re-affirmed his commitment to accept public funding and the limitations that come with it, according to the telephone survey in mid-February. Just 27% correctly answered McCain, while 16% thought it was Obama who had made the commitment. By way of comparison, a separate survey found that most Americans (54%) could identify Obama as the candidate who had been accused of plagiarism. There may be many reasons why the campaign finance topic has not generated more heat, but certainly one reason is that most people don’t like the concept to begin with—just 30% favor public funding of Presidential campaigns while 47% are opposed. Over half of Republicans (52%) are opposed to it, while 28% favor the practice. Democrats are split--with 38% opposed to public funding of campaigns and 36% for it. Forty-one percent (41%) of voters say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who refused public funding, while 23% say they would be less likely. The issue has no impact on 29% of voters. The survey also found that 30% of likely voters say friendly reporters benefit a candidate more than campaign cash. Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the cash is more important while 41% are not sure. The skepticism about media bias runs at least as deep as the skepticism about campaign contributions. A mid-December survey found that voters overwhelmingly believe reporters cover Presidential debates in a way that helps their favorite Presidential candidate. A series of surveys conducted in July found that major news sources such as The New York Times, Fox News and MSNBC are seen as biased. Crosstabs are available to Premium Members only. Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. The Rasmussen Reports Election Edge™ Premium Service offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage available anywhere. Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade. TOP STORIES42% Support Health Care Reform After Release of Pelosi's Version 49% See GOP Takeover of Congress Next Year As Possible What They Told Us: Reviewing Last Week’s Key Polls Americans Favor Home Buyer Tax Credit Until They Hear How Much It Costs 30% Favor One Party Running the White House and Congress Voters Divided On Whether Passing Good Legislation More Important Than Killing Bad Bills 45% for Obama, 49% Against – If Election Were Held Right Now President Obama: One Year After Winning it All There Is No Honor; There's Only Killing By Debra J. Saunders Advertisement
|