Friday, June 24, 2011
There he goes again, fulfilling another promise. Imagine that. When he announced the surge in Afghanistan, he said it was temporary. Democrats, especially liberals, screamed bloody murder. How dare he do what he said he would do during the campaign: focus on Afghanistan, on the threat posed by al-Qaida, on capturing Osama bin Laden, dead or alive?
He went ahead and did all those things, and now he's beginning the troop withdrawal. Osama is dead. Al-Qaida has been drastically weakened.
Imagine. A president who does what he says he'll do: universal access to health insurance, gays in the military, diversity on the courts, even an improving economy.
Who does this guy think he is?
More importantly, what do we think of him?
The polls suggest the president is running ahead of every one of the potential Republican candidates and behind the generic one. Depending on where you sit, the good or bad news is that generic candidates don't run. Real candidates run.
With all due respect (in the law, that means with no respect at all, but I'm trying), sometimes it seems like the pollsters of the world must be calling teenagers instead of grownups. You know how it is with teenagers (and the adult versions who never grow up): What they have is never as good as some imagined ideal out there that keeps them from realizing how lucky they are. They may be dating a very nice boy or girl, but where is George Clooney? At a time when so many people are looking for work and can't find it, the job they have is just not good enough, not as good as the fantasy job they can't exactly describe but must be out there somewhere.
The Republicans have some folks running for president who would never fit into what the late Lee Atwater (the first George Bush's campaign manager and a practitioner of the hardball, without-limits brand of politics) called the little boat that contains the relatively small number of men and women (OK, men back then) whom Americans could even imagine as president.
Sorry, Rep. Bachmann. Your feet are planted firmly on the shore. But Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman and Chris Christie, to name just three possible or actual candidates, all have the potential to jump in there. Barack Obama is very much in there.
So why is none of these guys doing as well as the generic Republican? Is Romney too Mormon or too liberal? Is Huntsman out because he took the call from the president and served as ambassador to China? What makes the generic Republican so much more attractive than the real ones, and also more attractive than the president who keeps his promises?
We are forever telling politicians they need to grow up, and there are enough of them who do (hello, Anthony Weiner) that the message makes sense. But only to a point. It takes guts and determination and very thick skin to run for president -- and even more of all of the above to serve as commander in chief. No one is going to agree with you all the time. No one is going to avoid mistakes.
Maybe we need to grow up, as well. I feel very lucky to have Obama as president and very proud of the way he is restoring respect for America in the world and setting an example in politics by sticking to his guns and keeping his promises. But I also give credit to the Republicans who are willing to spend the next year living on the road, giving speeches until they're hoarse, rarely seeing their families and getting knocked around by their fellow candidates and the press, because they have ambition and also because they want to serve this country.
There is no such thing as the perfect candidate, which is what the generic polls measure. I wish the real Republicans the best. But I'm with the guy who keeps his eye on the ball and considers promises to be just that.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentaries.
See Other Commentaries by Susan Estrich.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.