If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

Is Democracy in a Death Spiral?

A Commentary By Patrick J. Buchanan

Friday, April 21, 2017

"You all start with the premise that democracy is some good. I don't think it's worth a damn. Churchill is right. The only thing to be said for democracy is that there is nothing else that's any better. ...   

"People say, 'If the Congress were more representative of the people it would be better.' I say Congress is too damn representative. It's just as stupid as the people are, just as uneducated, just as dumb, just as selfish."   

This dismissal of democracy, cited by historian H. W. Brands in "The General vs. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War," is attributed to that great populist Secretary of State Dean Acheson.    

Few would air such views today, as democracy has been divinized.   

Indeed, for allegedly hacking the Clinton campaign and attacking "our democracy," Vladimir Putin has been condemned to the ninth circle of hell. Dick Cheney and John McCain have equated Moscow's mucking around in our sacred democratic rituals to an "act of war."   

Yet democracy seems everywhere to be losing its luster.   

Among its idealized features is the New England town meeting. There, citizens argued, debated, decided questions of common concern.   

Town hall meetings today recall a time when folks came out to mock miscreants locked in stocks in the village square. Congressmen returning to their districts in Holy Week were shouted down as a spectator sport. A Trump rally in Berkeley was busted up by a mob. The university there has now canceled an appearance by Ann Coulter.   

Charles Murray, whose books challenge conventional wisdom about the equality of civilizations, and Heather Mac Donald, who has documented the case that hostility to cops is rooted in statistical ignorance, have both had their speeches violently disrupted on elite campuses.    

In Washington, our two-party system is in gridlock. Comity and collegiality are vanishing. Across Europe, centrist parties shrink as splinter parties arise and "illiberal democracies" take power.  

Russia and China, which have embraced autocratic capitalism, have attracted admirers and emulators by the seeming success of their strongman rule.    

President Trump, seeing the way the world is going, welcomes to the White House Egypt's President Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi, whose army dumped over the elected government and jailed thousands.   

Following a disputed referendum that granted President Recep Tayyip Erdogan near-dictatorial powers, Trump phoned his congratulations to the Turkish autocrat. It was Erdogan who described democracy as a bus you get off when it reaches your stop.    

Why is liberal democracy, once hailed as the future of mankind, in a deepening bear market? First, Acheson was not all wrong.    

When George W. Bush declared that the peoples of the Middle East should decide their future in democratic elections, Lebanon chose Hezbollah, the Palestinians chose Hamas, the Egyptians the Muslim Brotherhood. The first two are U.S.-designated terrorist groups, as members of Congress wish to designate the third. Not an auspicious beginning for Arab democracy.   

In Sunday's election in France, a Communist-backed admirer of Hugo Chavez, Jean-Luc Melenchon, and the National Front's Marine Le Pen could emerge as the finalists on May 7.   

Democracy is increasingly seen as a means to an end, not an end in itself. If democracy doesn't deliver, dispense with it.   

Democracy's reputation also suffers from the corruption and incompetence of some of its celebrated champions.   

The South African regime of Jacob Zuma, of Nelson Mandela's ANC, faces a clamor for his resignation. Brazil's Dilma Rousseff was impeached in August. South Korean President Park Geun-hye has been removed and jailed for corruption. Venezuela's Hugo Chavez was elected president four times.   

In Federalist No. 2, John Jay called us a "band of brethren" and "one united people" who shared the same ancestors, language, religion, principles, manners, customs.    

Seventy years later, the brethren went to war with one another, though they seem to have had more in common in 1861 than we do today.    

Forty percent of Americans now trace their ancestral roots to Latin America, Asia and Africa. The Christian component of the nation shrinks, as the numbers of Muslims, Hindu, atheists, agnostics grow. We have two major languages now. Scores of other languages are taught in schools.    

Not only do we disagree on God, gays and guns, but on politics and ideology, morality and faith, right and wrong. One-half of America sees the other as "a basket of deplorables. ... racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic ... bigots."   

How, outside an external attack that unites us, like 9/11, do we find unity among people who dislike each other so much and regard each other's ideas and ideals as hateful and repellent?   

Democracy requires common ground on which all can stand, but that ground is sinking beneath our feet, and democracy may be going down the sinkhole with it.    

Where liberals see as an ever-more splendid diversity of colors, creeds, ethnicities, ideologies, beliefs and lifestyles, the Right sees the disintegration of a country, a nation, a people, and its replacement with a Tower of Babel.    

Visions in conflict that democracy cannot reconcile.   

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book "The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2017 CREATORS.COM

See Other Political Commentaries.

See Other Commentaries by Pat Buchanan.

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $4.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.