« If it's in the news it's in our polls. «
« Rasmussen produces some of the most accurate and reliable polls in the country today. »
-Larry Sabato, University of Virginia« Rasmussen, an organization with fast zeitgeist reflexes.... «
-The Politico« If it's in the news it's in our polls. «
« The best place to look for polls that are spot on is RasmussenReports.com «
-Michael Barone, The Washington Examiner`« If you really want to know what people in America think, you can't find a better place to look than Rasmussen Reports «
-Susan Estrich« If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y.Times, go with Rasmussen! »
-Mickey Kaus, Slate Magazine
Advertisement
|
Advertisement
The Mundell-Laffer Solution
A Commentary By Lawrence Kudlow
Friday, October 09, 2009
Advertisement
Team Obama is in economic trouble on two fronts right now: The dollar could be headed toward its demise, while the jobs and unemployment numbers have gotten worse. (The unemployment rate is up to 9.8 percent as of the September report released last week.) And there's a simple policy mix the White House could adopt to fix this. It could enact the Mundell-Laffer supply-side approach of a steady King Dollar for price stability and low marginal tax rates to spur jobs and economic growth. Columbia professor and Nobel Prize winner Robert Mundell and Reagan advisor Arthur Laffer put this formula to work nearly 30 years ago, and it launched a massive low-inflation, bull-market prosperity. Of course, I am a supply-side fossil. I am a dinosaur and a relic of the past. But I still believe this approach could work again, even if it's not going to happen. The dollar has been falling on and off for nearly 10 years, and it's in big trouble right now. The commodity inflation, housing bubble and oil shock of recent years all can be traced to dollar weakness and excess money-creation by the Fed. A weak dollar helped destroy the Bush Boom and create the Great Recession. But now people are talking about ending the dollar's reserve-currency status. According to London's Independent, the Arab oil producers in the Gulf are planning with China, Russia, Japan and France to end dollar transactions for oil and move instead to a basket of currencies that might include the Japanese yen, the Chinese yuan and the euro, along with gold and some kind of regional Gulf-state currency. I say, where there's smoke there's fire. The dollar-demise story just won't go away, and it's clear now that China and others have lost confidence in the greenback. For the U.S., this is mostly a self-inflicted wound. And the Treasury and the Fed are in denial about it. The gold price has jumped all the way to $1,050, while the dollar index has fallen again. Without question, the U.S. is creating too many dollars through the Fed, and fiscal disarray continues to threaten more of the same. And here's a real conflict brewing in the financial markets: The Fed is fighting (SET ITAL) deflation (END ITAL) with a near-zero interest-rate target, while gold, the dollar and commodity markets are signaling that (SET ITAL) inflation (END ITAL) is the real problem. Somebody is going to be very right here, and somebody is going to be very wrong. I'm betting on the markets being right. So I have a thought, at least for the short run: The Fed should follow Australia, the first G-20 country to raise its target interest rate. The Aussies lifted their rate a quarter point to 3.25 percent. Right now, the U.S. Fed should lift (SET ITAL) its (END ITAL) target rate by 25 basis points. The fed funds target is currently 15 basis points, so this move would make it 40 basis points. It would be a dollar-protection signal; a price-stability signal. At the least, it would be a beginning. Next, the Treasury should buy some dollars in the open market to back up the Fed. And as the White House considers a second stimulus package, here's another thought: Go for growth. Reduce tax rates to provide growth incentives (something Team Obama has avoided like the plague). Cut the top corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent, and accompany that with a small-business tax cut from 35 percent to 25 percent. And leave the Bush tax cuts alone. Don't let them expire in 2011. That's cap-gains, dividends and the top personal rate. Yes, this is a supply-side solution: Reducing tax rates will ignite growth incentives. And by applying it, Team Obama would be borrowing from George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy (and Calvin Coolidge and Andrew Mellon, too). Forget about Keynesian spending multipliers, which Harvard's Robert Barrow writes are less than one. Forget about class warfare. Forget about income redistribution. Go for growth. Again, I know I'm a supply-side fossil and a relic of the past. But the Mundell-Laffer policy plan -- which has worked historically for Republicans (SET ITAL) and (END ITAL) Democrats -- could truly save the nation and its economy at this critical juncture. Monetary restraint and the incentives of lower tax rates will solve the dollar and unemployment problems. In our supposedly post-partisan era, why not give it a try, President Obama? COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM See More Commentary by Lawrence Kudlow See Other Political Commentary Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports. Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information. The Rasmussen Reports Election Edge™ Premium Service offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage available anywhere. Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade. TOP STORIESDaily Presidential Tracking Poll What They Told Us: Reviewing Last Week’s Key Polls Republicans Maintain Steady Lead on Generic Ballot Brown Ensnared in His Own Tapegate Trap By Debra J. Saunders In New York, Flanked by Lawyers By Debra J. Saunders Voters Continue to See Deficit Reduction as Top Priority To Create Jobs, Voters Say Cut Taxes and Stop Spending Voters’ Opinions of Congressional Leaders Remain Steady Voters Now Closely Divided On U.S. Chances for Victory in Afghanistan Advertisement
|