Friday, April 23, 2010
Political observers have had their attention directed to state attorneys general of late, due to the court suits against the federal health care reform bill initially filed by fifteen AGs (14 of them Republican, and a lone Democrat from Louisiana). With twenty or more states now signed on to the lawsuits, attorneys general are in the news more than ever.
There’s an old joke about the National Association of Attorneys General—their registered name is supposedly the National Association of Aspiring Governors.
All are credible candidates, and it will be a surprise if three or four of them aren’t in the winner’s circle come November. (Three other current or former state AGs are running for the U.S. Senate: Republican Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, and Democrats Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Jack Conway of Kentucky.)
This is precisely half the gubernatorial success rate of lieutenant governors. In the last quarter-century, fully 22% of the state No. 2’s became No. 1 (see our previous Crystal Ball on this subject: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/ljs2009073001/). By the way, 43 states elect the attorney general and 43 elect the lieutenant governor, though the list of states in each case is not identical (the footnote below gives the full lists of each).
There’s a major reason for the discrepancy, of course. Under most state constitutions, the lieutenant governor directly succeeds the governor when he or she leaves office mid-term (because of death, resignation, or impeachment). Just in recent years, 28 lieutenant governors have become governor in this fashion.
By contrast, just one attorney general has succeeded to the governorship in recent decades , Democrat Bruce Babbitt of Arizona. The governor of Arizona, Raul Castro (D), resigned to be appointed Ambassador to Argentina by President Carter in 1977. Secretary of State Wes Bolin (D) then became governor, but he died in a matter of months. Attorney General Babbitt was next in line, was sworn in as governor in March 1978, and went on to be elected on his own in 1978 and 1982. Babbitt also ran for president in 1988, and eventually became President Clinton’s secretary of the interior in the 1990s.
Some states clearly have a greater propensity to elect attorneys general to the governorship, as the following chart shows. It was compiled by Crystal Ball researchers Isaac Wood and Joseph Figueroa.
Arkansas and Virginia have both seen three recent attorneys general rise to the top. The Razorback state started with a fellow named Bill Clinton, state AG for two years (1977-1878) before the first of his terms as governor. Clinton was eventually succeeded, when he left the state in 1993 to become president, by Jim Guy Tucker (who by then had become lieutenant governor). Arkansas’ current governor, Mike Beebe, was the AG before his election in 2006.
In Virginia three of the last seven governors have been AGs. In part, this is because Virginia has a very short ballot, electing only the lieutenant governor and attorney general in addition to governor, and the governor is limited to one consecutive four-year term. (Virginia is the only state remaining with such a prohibition.) The other statewide elected officials are naturally considered in line for the statehouse, and they often run flat out for four years to get the promotion.
Arizona and Missouri are the only other states to have even as many as two AGs succeeding to the governorship.
The attorney general post is generally viewed as a more substantive one than the lieutenant governorship, since it is full time with a large staff. Most lieutenant governorships are part time with very small staffs and salaries. But if your goal is the governorship, an aspiring politician may want to reconsider his or her first statewide elective goal.
Lieutenant governors are an Avis-style No. 2, but at least with respect to the governorship, they try harder, and succeed more often.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.