If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

For Straying Pols, It's the Hurt That Matters

A Commentary By Froma Harrop

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

An open-minded individual, I am willing to support an adulterer for elective office. But my ability to look past marital infidelity depends on how much humiliation was heaped on the wife. The details matter.

And measuring their importance is hard to do. The unfaithful rarely conduct their affairs in a clean, compartmentalized matter.

For a wife, having a husband actually fall in love with a mistress must be the worst. When he chatters at length about his passion for the other woman, the pain can be excruciating. By this measure, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford's crime is grave, exceeded only by that of former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Not only did Giuliani sing the praises of his lover, he compounded the cruelty by informing his wife of their impending divorce through a news conference.

In olden times, politicians were far more discreet. Franklin D. Roosevelt's long relationship with Lucy Mercer hurt his wife, but Eleanor could act as first lady undogged by public scandal.

It can help matters when divorce is out of the question. The structure of a marriage stays intact, and the wife carves out her own life.

Like Eleanor, Jackie Kennedy pursued her own interests as her husband John F. Kennedy philandered. Hillary Clinton followed the same path.

Love was not the driving force for Kennedy, or for Bill Clinton.

It was almost certainly not the motivator for former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards. That also eases the wife's burden.

Similarly, having a prostitute as the other woman should soften the wife's mortification. New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and Louisiana Sen. David Vitter both paid for sex. It was strictly business.

Learning that a husband sought out gay lovers should also lessen the wife's sense of shame. The spouses of former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey and former Idaho Sen. Larry Craig might be embarrassed to have the public think that they had no idea of their husbands' proclivities. But their husbands' extramarital relationships in no way reflected on their allure to hetero men.

The more hypocrisy involved, the more tawdry an affair becomes.

During the presidential campaign, Edwards shamelessly portrayed himself as America's most caring and committed husband while romping with a party girl.

That Elizabeth was fighting cancer made his conduct more sickening.

Politicians who play the moralist, then stray, turn their marriages into laughingstocks. Nevada Sen. John Ensign was a longtime member of the Promise Keepers, dedicated to strengthening marriage. And Spitzer crusaded against prostitution.

Wives are not totally helpless in defending their dignity. Jenny Sanford's refusal to play helpmate or tragic victim following her husband's romp has made her a heroine to countless observers.

Silda Spitzer, Suzanne Craig, Hillary Clinton, Wendy Vitter and Elizabeth Edwards all appeared in their husbands' contrition show. No one put a gun to their heads. If they did it to save their husbands' political careers, that was their choice.

And some betrayed wives don't deserve much sympathy at all.

Thrice-married Newt Gingrich cheated on wife No. 2, with whom he had cheated on wife No. 1. How sorry can one feel for wife No. 2?

A political note: The recent high-profile Republican adulteries have effectively removed Gingrich from serious consideration as a presidential candidate. If Sanford and Ensign are disqualified, how could Gingrich contend?

Let's end on a bright note. Many marriages survive and even thrive after infidelities come to light. Jackie was said to like Jack, despite his wandering. The same seems true of Hillary.

And those wives who want their politicos back might take comfort in the Stendahl line: "It's not impossible to become bored in the presence of a mistress."

COPYRIGHT 2009 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.