If it's in the News, it's in our Polls. Public opinion polling since 2003.

 

Old White Guy vs. GOP Woman

A Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Thursday, June 10, 2010

So much for the undeserved stereotype of California Republicans voting lemming-like for the most conservative, unelectable contenders.  Tuesday, GOP voters rejected the most conservative candidates in favor of moderate hopefuls generally deemed to be more likely to win in November.

Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman trounced Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner with 64 percent of the vote. Former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina beat two tough opponents with 56 percent. Most candidates endorsed by former Gov. Pete Wilson, like Whitman, won big. Almost all of those endorsed by conservative demigod Tom McClintock tanked. It wasn't even close.

Down ticket, Lt. Gov. Abel Maldonado, a GOP moderate, fended off more conservative competition. In the attorney general's race, Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley won despite charges that he was not sufficiently tough on crime.

My fave: After Politico.com flogged the story that birther Orly Taitz could win the nod for secretary of state, Orange County real estate developer Damon Dunn won 74 percent of the vote. Ha, ha.

The Democratic Party, on the other hand, eschewed the center and trended far left in contested primaries by nominating San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom for lieutenant governor and S.F. District Attorney Kamala Harris for attorney general.

So help me: Who are the ideologues here? 

I continue to harbor doubts about the electability of Whitman and Fiorina, given their spotty voting records and lack of political experience.  As the now-official Democratic gubernatorial nominee, state Attorney General Jerry Brown, said Tuesday night, "It's not enough for someone rich and restless to look in the mirror one morning and decide, 'Hey, it's time to be governor of California.'"

Whitman had some good lines of her own. Such as: Brown "has aligned nearly every single interest group in Sacramento against us. And that means favors will be owed to every power broker with a vested interest in keeping our state budget broken, our schools underperforming and the state pension system spinning into insolvency."

On Wednesday, Brown called for 10 town hall debates. Whitman's response? She told reporters, there will be "plenty of debates, but what I would say to Jerry Brown is instead of calling for debates, he should lay out his plan for California."

Don't hold your breath on that score. When I asked Brown spokesman Sterling Clifford earlier this week when and if Brown would present his own budget plan -- as Whitman has done -- the answer essentially was that Brown would work with the Legislature to come up with "collaborative" solutions.

Now you would think Whitman would leap for the chance to point out that working too well with big-spending lawmakers beholden to special interests got California into this soup. But her campaign is about as nimble as a large cruise ship in a small harbor. No script-ee, no talk-ee.  Expect more real action U.S. Senate-side. Tuesday night, Sen. Barbara Boxer's campaign invited Fiorina to debate. Fiorina responded Wednesday, "Bring it on. Anytime, anywhere."

And: "Barbara, meet me in Mendota," where the unemployment rate is 40 percent, thanks in part to federal water policies. If they both mean what they say -- never a given in politics -- Boxer and Fiorina aren't afraid of a fair fight.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

See Other  Political Commentary                                    

See Other Commentary by Debra J. Saunders                        

Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.

Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection, publication and distribution of public opinion information.

We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence, we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions, sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day. If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a daily update newsletter and various media outlets across the country.

Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll and commentaries are available for free to the general public. Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on upcoming elections, consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers, Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs and a full history of our data.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.