Rasmussen Reports
The most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a mid-term election.
Premium MembershipLoginSignup
Search
Sign up for free daily updates
Advertisement
Advertisement

Montana Senate: Burns (R) Trailing Tester (D) By Two
Tester (D) 50%; Burns (R) 48%
Advertisement

In Montana, Senator Conrad Burns (R) has been mounting a furious comeback. While Jon Tester still has a slight edge in the race, the trend has been unmistakably in the GOP direction. After Labor Day, it was Jon Tester (D) by nine over Senator Conrad Burns (R). When October began, it was Tester by seven. Last Wednesday, it was Tester by four. Now, our final Montana poll shows Tester leading by just two points--50% to 48% (see crosstabs).

Ironically, Burns is one candidate who might be helped by the overall GOP weakness this year. If Montana voters have a simple choice between Jon Tester and Conrad Burns, Tester probably wins. However, while Montanans may be ready to fire Burns as their Senator, they're a bit more reluctant to have Democrats take over the Senate. Visits by President Bush and Vice President Cheney this week put that issue squarely before the voters by drawing more attention to the national implications of this race.

The President’s Job Approval rating in Montana is currently at 49%.

We are shifting this race from "Leans Democrat" to “Toss-Up” in our Senate Balance of Power summary.

Burdened by scandal, Senator Burns has been struggling all year to stay afloat politically. With one exception, he has lagged in each of our last ten polls (in August, the race was a tie). The Senator received more money from disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff than any other Congressman, and Tester and other Democrats in the state weren't about to let the electorate forget it.

The race bears some resemblance to New Jersey’s 2006 Senate competition. In both cases, the incumbent has been burdened by ethical challenges that made the race much more competitive than expected. Also, the same national forces helping Burns in Montana have helped Bob Menendez in New Jersey. In that state, of course, it’s voter preference for a Senate controlled by Democrats that helps the embattled incumbent. The major difference in these races is that Menendez was never in as much trouble as Burns, so he looks to be headed for re-election on Tuesday.

Crosstabs available for Premium Members only.

Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.

The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.

Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.

Survey of 500 Likely Voters
November 4, 2006

Election 2006: Montana Senate

Jon Tester (D)

50%

Conrad Burns (R)

48%

Election 2006: Montana Senate
Three-Poll Rolling Average

Surveys

Tester

Burns

Oct 26-Nov 1-Nov 4

50%

47%

Oct 18-Oct 26-Nov 1

50%

46%

Oct 11-Oct 18-Oct 26

49%

45%

Sep 20-Oct 11-
Oct 18

49%

44%

Sep 13-Sep 20-Oct

50%

43%

Aug-Sep 13-Sep 20

50%

44%

Jul-Aug-Sep 13

50%

44%

May-Jul-Aug

48%

45%

Apr-May-Jul

47%

45%

Mar-Apr-May

46%

45%

Feb-Mar-Apr

45%

45%

Election 2006: Montana Senate

Date

Tester

Burns

Nov 4

50%

48%

Nov 1

50%

46%

Oct 26

51%

47%

Oct 18

48%

46%

Oct 11

49%

42%

Sep 20

50%

43%

Sep 13

52%

43%

Aug 8

47%

47%

Jul 6

50%

43%

May 11

48%

44%

Apr 11

44%

47%

Mar 14

46%

43%

Feb 7

46%

46%

TOP STORIES

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

Electoral College: Democrats 210 Republicans 165 Leaners 125 Toss-Up 38

Biden Seen as Frontrunner for VP Nomination

What They Told Us: Reviewing Last Week’s Key Polls

49% Say Hillary Likely to Overshadow Obama at Convention

Democrats Lead by Ten on Generic Ballot

Bush Job Approval: One Point Above All-Time Low

37% Say African-Americans Face More Discrimination than Women

Senator who Births Babies gets Boost from Voters

The Democratic Ground Game: Can New Voters Make the Difference? By Justin M. Sizemore

Advertisement